Replies

JASON V HERRING
PART THREE

Note that no mention of Herring occurs until the end of this post, when he is mentioned in a large list of names. I have capitalized his name so that it could be easily found. Some asterisks might also help with locating it too! PLUS there is toward the end a very special role we have been told that JASON V HERRING WILL BE PLAYING!

https://www.worldtribune.com/documents-fbi-rushed-to-accommodate-clinton-days-before-election/

DOCUMENTS: FBI RUSHED TO ACCOMMODATE CLINTON DAYS BEFORE ELECTION

by WorldTribune Staff, February 12, 2019

The FBI, prodded by Hillary Clinton’s lawyer, moved swiftly in the days preceding the 2016 presidential election to stress that the agency concluded that material found on Anthony Weiner’s laptop would not change the conclusion that Clinton should not be charged for mishandling classified information, newly released documents reveal.

Documents obtained by Judicial Watch in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, show that former FBI General Counsel James Baker discussed the investigation of Clinton-related emails on Weiner’s laptop with Clinton’s lawyer, David Kendall. Baker then forwarded the conversation to his FBI colleagues.

The FOIA lawsuit also forced the release of an email dated Nov. 6, 2016 – two days before the election – by then-FBI official Peter Strzok telling Baker and other FBI colleagues: “[Redacted], Jon and I completed our review of all of the potential HRC work emails on the [Anthony Weiner] laptop. We found no previously unknown, potentially classified emails on the media.”

Judicial Watch previously reported, there were at least 18 classified emails found on Weiner’s laptop by the FBI. Paul Sperry’s RealClear Investigations reported that only 3,077 of the 340,000 emails on the laptop “were directly reviewed for classified or incriminating information.”

Also on Nov. 6, 2016, Comey sent a second letter reporting that the FBI’s review of the Weiner laptop material would not change his “conclusion” that Clinton should not be prosecuted.

On Oct. 28, 2016, the day that Comey sent a letter to Congress regarding the FBI’s discovery that the Weiner laptop contained Clinton’s emails, Kendall, within hours, emailed Baker requesting a call “ASAP” about the Comey letter.

Baker describes his follow-up call to senior FBI officials:
“I received the email below from David Kendall and I called him back. Before doing so I alerted DOJ via email that I would do that.

[Redacted paragraph] He said that our letter was “tantalizingly ambiguous” and made statements that were “inchoate and highly ominous” such that what we had done was worse than transparency because it allows people to make whatever they want out to make out of the letter to the prejudice of Secretary Clinton.

I told him that I could not respond to his requests at this time but that I would discuss it with others and get back to him.

I suggest that we have some kind of follow up meeting or phone call with this group either this evening or over the weekend to address this and probably other issues/questions that come up in the next 24 hours. Sound reasonable?”

Baker’s heads up on the Kendall call was sent to: Comey; then-Associate Deputy Director David Bowdich, who later replaced Andrew McCabe as deputy director; Michael Steinbach, the FBI’s former executive assistant director for national security; then-Assistant Director of Counterintelligence E.W. Priestap, now retired; James Rybicki, former chief of staff to Comey; FBI intelligence analyst Jonathan Moffa; *** FORMER ACTING ASSISTANT DIRECTOR JASON V. HERRING; ***Michael Kortan, FBI assistant director for public affairs, now retired; former principal deputy general counsel Trisha Anderson; Strzok and Page.

The emails show that a conference call for the above senior officials was set up for the next day by Strzok….

“…JASON HERRING WILL BE PROVIDING YOU WITH THREE 302S OF CURRENT AND FORMER FBI EMPLOYEES WHO WERE INTERVIEWED DURING THE COURSE OF THE CLINTON INVESTIGATION. THESE 302S ARE SCHEDULED TO BE RELEASED TO CONGRESS IN AN UNREDACTED FORM AT THE END OF THE WEEK, AND PRODUCED (WITH REDACTIONS) PURSUANT TO FOIA AT THE BEGINNING OF NEXT WEEK. As you will see, they describe a discussion about potential quid pro quo arrangement between then-DAD in IOD [deputy assistant director in International Operations Division] and an Undersecretary at the State Department whereby IOD would get more LEGAT [legal attaché] positions if the FBI could change the basis of the FOIA withhold re a Clinton email from classified to something else.”

The article continues.

Footnote:
The names covered in this three part series were mentioned in Q Drops #2697 and #2698

My takeaway with these people is I’m also getting a whiff of things on the horizon regarding the infamous LAPTOP. Are you? Also we are seeing the possible surfacing of the 302’s from the Clinton interviews. I personally consider these things to be approaching the level of “BOOMAGE” when they are finally launched. But that’s just me.

END PART THREE

Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q