The key to the Article V Convention of States, is not “how do we write the changes so slimy Lefty lawyers cannot ooze around them like they did in finding penumbras in Roe v. Wade while ignoring explicit text in the 2nd Amendment?”
The key is, “How do we keep the Commies from infiltrating and using the Article V to put a bunch of lefty wet dreams into the new Constitution with language that protects said wet dreams from repeal or review?”
Yes, what you say is of great importance and is well understood by leaders of the hundreds of conservative state legislators that are spearheading the effort to churn out the first amendment to be recorded by the National Archives and sent out for ratification. That amendment addresses peacetime balancing of the federal budget.
There are plenty of historical existing amendments that are not subject to abuse because of how they are written. Those amendments are a testament to how it can be done.
There are also provisions within the Constitution that the left would like to twist to their own devices but they are unable because the wording is so clear that no judge could survive a ruling in contradiction to the wording. These provisions are also a testament to the fact that words can be crafted to be abuse-resistant.
These are not just my thoughts, these are discussions that state legislative leaders have on the subject matter. I am only trying to pass on information that will educate others as to what is happening in the process.
The key is, “How do we keep the Commies from infiltrating and using the Article V to put a bunch of lefty wet dreams into the new Constitution with language that protects said wet dreams from repeal or review?”
***********************************************************************************
Amen. You put that so well.