Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MeganC

I agree with your comment. However, I am puzzled by the SS action here. He was investigating a threat/possible threat/instigation of violence against POTUS. That is his job. I am pretty certain he has the legal tools at his disposal to take this woman in for questioning. So I am wondering what he intended to accomplish in the first place.


33 posted on 01/14/2019 2:54:10 PM PST by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Magnum44

I agree that she should be questioned for such a thing but where she did not make a direct and specific threat that SHE was going to do anything then she didn’t commit a crime.

The correct action was to let her know she attracted attention and I’d say she got the message.


38 posted on 01/14/2019 2:57:33 PM PST by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44

The only legal tool to do that, barring her voluntary submittal, is to arrest her. There is no “right” to question anybody, even somebody under arrest. Maybe, especially somebody under arrest.


47 posted on 01/14/2019 3:09:01 PM PST by Cassius Flavia Agrippa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson