Replies

Many years ago, I worked for an organization that “gave” all its employees “free” Newsweek subscriptions. I hated it and never read it. I wanted to avoid senseless waste (tree killing) so I tried repeatedly to cancel my “free” mandatory subscription. Ah yes, it was mandatory because my company was helping Newsweek keep its circulation numbers up, even though I never met an employee who actually read it or wanted to receive it.

Well, this CIA Outlet is still at work, pumping out eager articles saying Ginzburg with be back in top form in no time, according to a “top” doctor.

And then there’s this article warning the Trump administration (oh they don’t word it that way, but that’s what it is) not to even think about appointing a new SC justice.

“Speaking to Politico, conservative legal scholar and director of the Heritage Foundation’s Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies John Malcolm said that if Trump was able to pick a third Supreme Court justice, “it would be a brutal confirmation.

“The first two were not easy at all, but this would be much harder,” Malcolm said. “When Neil Gorsuch was the nominee, you were replacing a conservative with a conservative. With Kavanaugh, you were replacing the perennial swing voter, who more times than not sided with the so-called conservative wing, so that slightly solidified the conservative wing.”
https://www.newsweek.com/ruth-bader-ginsburg-illness-if-trump-appointee-replaces-supreme-court-justice-1287940

So we are to understand we haven’t seen even seen “difficult” or “brutal” yet, when it comes to nominating a supreme court judge! Kavanaugh’s nomination was a cakewalk, we’re to understand, compared with what “they” will “do” to anyone nominated by Trump to replace Ginzburg. Newsweek never met a banana republic they didn’t like. What a circus “they” make of our government! :(