RE: Janda
1. No comms outside 8chan.
2. Cletus trusts 8chan and FReeQs. Others are viewed askance.
3. I have no reason to _not_ trust my backchannel party. Caveat: Rust, but terrify (Red Badger)
4. Jackie-soi*? Meh...not so much.
* - I firmly believe I was the first to call JB this name back in August/September. Did so in a post to baggie. It is not on his “list” because I did not include him on the post. Jackie is getting paid by the post for engagement.
There is no justice.
I like my name “Jack the Derper” but it isn’t on the list. Maybe because I never put JtD’s name in the to box, nor do I read his leavings.
Funny the initials JB match John Brennan! However, much as it pains me to say it, I don’t think John Brennan is smart enough to write as well as our notorious Jack Black.
1. No comms outside 8chan.
To: smileyface; bagster
RE: Janda
[Texokie comments in brackets]
1. No comms outside 8chan.
[Janda states clearly more than once, that his sources ARE NOT Q RELATED, but are very much sources he has gleaned and gathered from his years in DC. I think you sometimes rely on your own sources in a similar way, don’t you, Cletus? I’m really glad you have been willing to share those non-Q insights! ]
2. Cletus trusts 8chan and FReeQs. Others are viewed askance.
[Understandable]
3. I have no reason to _not_ trust my backchannel party. Caveat: Rust, but terrify (Red Badger)
[Exactly. You have proven experience with them.... just as Janda says he has experience with his. Do we, who do not know them, trust these sources as well? Well, that is up to each one to assess. At this point, I’m certainly willing to listen! Closely.]
4. Jackie-soi*? Meh...not so much.
* - I firmly believe I was the first to call JB this name back in August/September. Did so in a post to baggie. It is not on his “list” because I did not include him on the post. Jackie is getting paid by the post for engagement.
[no texokie comment on point 4]
299 posted on 1/11/2019, 1:54:19 PM by Cletus.D.Yokel