Dear Mother, I did not intend to destabilize the thread. It was merely a hat tip. Can you imagine? Anon calling out JB? On 8Chan? I thought it was worth noting.
Never let it be said that I said anything behind someone's back that I wouldn't say to their face. That's one of my rules.
Please don't mistake my gentleman's courtesy for a man crush.
It is healthy for us FReeQ researchers to be questioned by reasonable people. Most of the trolls that post are not reasonable. Jack, though a troll wannabee, has posted some informative findings. Despite his thin-skinned obsession with name-calling (deserved) I'd still like to hear his opinion.
I haven't gone out searching the regular boards much but, I assume by what you said, that he's very anti-us.
Meanwhile, "The Hunt for Red October" is playing on Encore channel.
PS: I learned to have some patience and restraint while sitting in jirgas, drinking tea with people who wanted to kill me and I wanted to kill them. Restraint on all parts was desirable and led to fruitful results. :)
"It is healthy for us FReeQ researchers to be questioned by reasonable people. Most of the trolls that post are not reasonable. Jack, though a troll wannabee, has posted some informative findings. "
In case the conflicts we've encountered with him were "before your time," on FR (Glad you're here, KitJ), I'll post a little history here. Jack "sometimes" posts informative findings, but only as a shield against being called out for his true purpose - getting our threads removed from FR and undermining us while we're here. Even his seemingly "reasonable" moments often include 'strategic doom' messages meant to demoralize patriots - that's what Bagster called out on our last thread. I can provide you with link examples via pm when I have time - I know how you like to base your opinions and support on research.
Despite his thin-skinned obsession with name-calling (deserved) I'd still like to hear his opinion.
I understand. Would you consider enjoying his opinions via pm or asking to be on his ping list, instead of pinging him to our thread? It's accurate information and thread stability I'm after, I don't want to keep you from enjoying the content you seek.
PS: I learned to have some patience and restraint while sitting in jirgas, drinking tea with people who wanted to kill me and I wanted to kill them. Restraint on all parts was desirable and led to fruitful results. :)
______________________________________
Please assure me you are writing or have written your memoir....and you keep it up to date!
Kit, I've been studying Jacky Derp since day one, and it's been a while. I've read every word he's typed on these threads (and plenty of others) for months now. I've seen every iteration of his "strategy" and I've seen his statements which flew in the face of his statements here, on other threads.
There was a time when he pretended on these threads to believe and support the Qanon movement, while at the exact same time bashing Q and Q supporters on other threads.
Part of his shtick is to bring good info to the table, while weaving in his insidious, demoralizing dark message of doom and veeery subtly calling us stupid for believing in Q.
There was even a time when he had me fooled, but never the Mother of Dragons. She is very wise, and the breaker of chains.
No. Jack Black is the most dangerous of trolls. He is a "Pied Piper" troll. He collects admirers then works his bitch magic on them and the crowd.
Beware.
#StayClearTheMoors
Bagster