"It is healthy for us FReeQ researchers to be questioned by reasonable people. Most of the trolls that post are not reasonable. Jack, though a troll wannabee, has posted some informative findings. "
In case the conflicts we've encountered with him were "before your time," on FR (Glad you're here, KitJ), I'll post a little history here. Jack "sometimes" posts informative findings, but only as a shield against being called out for his true purpose - getting our threads removed from FR and undermining us while we're here. Even his seemingly "reasonable" moments often include 'strategic doom' messages meant to demoralize patriots - that's what Bagster called out on our last thread. I can provide you with link examples via pm when I have time - I know how you like to base your opinions and support on research.
Despite his thin-skinned obsession with name-calling (deserved) I'd still like to hear his opinion.
I understand. Would you consider enjoying his opinions via pm or asking to be on his ping list, instead of pinging him to our thread? It's accurate information and thread stability I'm after, I don't want to keep you from enjoying the content you seek.