Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: John4.11; Cletus.D.Yokel

Well, my question was about what Cletus posted (courtesy Cletus ping):


The members who were not elected/reelected convene the new Congress (agree to seat incumbent members). They then agree to seat the new members.

Members who are re-elected are considered anew as their “term” closed at the Ned of the old Congress.

Ostensibly, the members “carried over” could deny seating to others at the convening but that would cause an election crisis. As would denying in-coming members.


I just don’t understand because all House of Rep members are elected or re-elected every two years, so what members are “carried over” who could deny seating? I understand that Senators’ elections are staggered, so there are 2/3 that are continuing their terms, but can they deny seating to Representatives?


1,704 posted on 12/30/2018 4:30:00 PM PST by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1703 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

Yes. I understand your question because I have that same question.


1,707 posted on 12/30/2018 4:34:35 PM PST by John4.11 (WWG1WGA (Stand firm and stay strong))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1704 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah

No. I think that it only applies to Senators. After researching, it appears to me that not much can be done with the house.

Even if convicted of felonies, the Representative may serve, unless there’s enough votes to oust them, which would mean a bunch of Dems would be needed.

Apologies if this has already been answered.


1,814 posted on 12/30/2018 9:41:06 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1704 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson