Posted on 12/14/2018 10:00:25 PM PST by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube Storm Is Upon Us Q - We Are The Plan - 6 min
YouTube Dan Duval Discovering the Truth With Dan Duval-Part 3 - Excellent orientation to Q by Praying Medic
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction Also, Stormisuponus on Bitchute
Threadreader Jason Wright Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Medium Martin Geddes WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
“Pay Attention”
Thread Qmap.pub Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread Qanon.app Q drops - copied from Qs 8chan board
Thread Qanonposts.com Q drops - copied from Qs 8chan board
Website We-go-all.net Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website Qntmpkts.keybase.pub Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website Whitehouse Whitehouse.gov - President Trump's Executive Orders, Proclamations, Nominations, WH press briefings and news
Website FBI vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Website State Dept. foia.state.gov - Virtual Reading Room Documents Search
Table FReeQs Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
“Power to the People”
Website Saul Montes-Bradley Non Q Commentary also hosting Rex , Brian Cates and Thomas Wictor
Vimeo Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops. Also, his own website, ITunes and Podbean.com
Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drop. Also, his own website YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent. Also, @NemoV on GAB.AI
Neonrevolt Includes highly detailed, investigative Q-drop reactionsAlso,@NeonRevolt on GAB.AI
GAB.AI Thomas_Wictor Includes excellent analysis of the Swamp
Lisa Mei Crowley Includes Q-drop reactions. Also, @lisamei62 on GAB.AI
Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
I hear tell that the position of administrative moderator is a voluntary position and that the "mods" run their own program.
What if were assigned as one. You must have observed, during your studies of what really goes on this thread, that she is fair-minded, judicious, patient, and restrained. She knows how to handle perceived authority and doesn't allow it to go to her head. She wouldn't abuse the position or the "power".
If she were willing, and I don't know that she is, you and your team should consider granting her the position.
I see it as a win/win. No more headaches for you. No more headaches for us.
Whaddya think, admin mod?
p.s. I'm only addressing this to you cause you appear to want dialogue.
Thank you for listening.
Bagster
However, historically, when admin has thrown something to FREEPERS for a response, they were quite willing to have at least a moderately robust dialogue about what they threw out to the troops--for at least a few pages.
I think a failure to respond cooperatively to the mod's query would be MORE rude.
Ooooopsie.
Bagster
I think that would be an excellent solution.
Apologies. I meant to say, "What if ransomnote were assigned as one".
Sorry.
Bagster
Jocko, we’ve been doing well until our thread fully engaged disruptors, which is true of any regular thread on the forum.
If too many have too much of an allergy for the religion forum—why not merely a “philosophical caucus” or “social caucus” thread—maybe in a larger, more general TRUMP Forum or Chat or whatever such.
__________________________
Moving to a “no debate” thread would kill our friendly debates about theories and data that we use to refine our thinking and build our knowledge base. There’s no way to define a line clearly enough so that friendly debates could be separated from disruption debates.
We’ve grown through our struggles and realize that we are better off not engaging those who arrive to provoke. We’ve got this.
That would work for me—IF—the vast majority of the family would be self-disciplined, self-controlled enough to firmly support it. Personally, I’d still like to see you the mod over the Q forum.
Now that's cult talk right there.
#CharlesManson
#HelterSkelter
#NotHelpful
#WhyIsItSoQuietAllOfASudden
Bagster
No. Cult talk would be trying to get all your prospective wives in one room with no hair pulling or face scratching! LOL.
Hopefully, Ransomnote is right--it's settled enough.
Yes, ma'am I did.
(with your kind assistance, I think)
Bagster
Skipping posts is normal. Don’t let it bother you.
The list of people Huber has interviewed is extremely short. On top of that he lost 6,000 pages of documents sent by the private investigators twice, and had to ask them to be resent when Huber learned theyd be testifying at a Confessional hearing.
Huber is doing nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.