To: ETL
Oh how this stuff changes quickly.
When I took anthropology in the 90’s, they were saying that early pre-humans split off from three dwellers and lived in the savanahs and stepps and needed to stand to see farther. Now they are saying standing started in trees, which evokes monkeys more than apes.
Also, back then (unless my memory fails me) Australopithecus was in another fork, and not an ancenstor to humans.
2 posted on
12/12/2018 9:56:41 AM PST by
z3n
To: z3n
5 posted on
12/12/2018 10:01:52 AM PST by
ETL
(Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Iran Deal, Nukes: Click ETL)
To: z3n
I recall, from the early 80s, being taught that Australpithicus was a direct ancestor.
12 posted on
12/12/2018 10:13:59 AM PST by
gundog
( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
To: z3n
When I took anthropology in the 90’s, they were saying that early pre-humans split off from three dwellers and lived in the savanahs and stepps and needed to stand to see farther. Now they are saying standing started in trees, which evokes monkeys more than apes. Not if you actually read the article.
It says this specimen is a transitional form that lived in a mixed forest and savanah environment.
14 posted on
12/12/2018 10:27:47 AM PST by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: z3n
All I have to say about this nonsense is that learned or acquired traits are not inherited. Behavior does not alter or create Genes. The Genes for a human pelvis and foot had to be there already, before they could, over time, becomes more prevalent in the population.
20 posted on
12/12/2018 11:29:15 AM PST by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
To: z3n
Learned to walk upright in the trees?
That is a nice (feat)!!!!
21 posted on
12/12/2018 12:01:14 PM PST by
tallyhoe
To: z3n
32 posted on
12/12/2018 1:30:07 PM PST by
Fedora
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson