H.R.2884 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): COVFEFE Act of 2017 ... Shown Here: Introduced in House (06/12/2017) Communications Over Various Feeds Electronically For Engagement Act of 2017 or the COVFEFE Act of 2017 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/2884
INTERESTING DECODE BY SB2:
Here's the link to steps to decode covfefe message(double meanings ya know)-
The decode of covfefe means WAIT TO DIE.
So using this method the entire tweet was:
Despite the constant negative press" wait to die.
Which synchs up with:
Q818:
Libel laws.
End of MSM.
Q
https://www.serial.rocks/post-3 INTERESTING, BUT WHO KNOWS-NOT I THAT'S FOR SURE.
To: TEXOKIE
Apparently the tweet was on May 31, 2017. The wiki does not specify when it was voted on: The Communications Over Various Feeds Electronically for Engagement Act (COVFEFE Act) is a bill introduced into the United States House of Representatives in 2017, during the 115th United States Congress.... **************************************************************************** Bill was introduced on 6/12/2017, so POTUS tweet predates that. Might have been on the agenda before the Tweet. Link below:
H.R.2884 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): COVFEFE Act of 2017 ... Shown Here: Introduced in House (06/12/2017) Communications Over Various Feeds Electronically For Engagement Act of 2017 or the COVFEFE Act of 2017 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/2884
INTERESTING DECODE BY SB2:
Here’s the link to steps to decode covfefe message(double meanings ya know)-
The decode of covfefe means WAIT TO DIE.
So using this method the entire tweet was:;
Despite the constant negative press” wait to die.
Which synchs up with:
Q818:
Libel laws.
End of MSM.
Q
https://www.serial.rocks/post-3 INTERESTING, BUT WHO KNOWS-NOT I THAT’S FOR SURE.
1,867 posted on 12/13/2018, 7:07:13 PM by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1646
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Thanks, GE! I appreciate your nailing some of that down - especially the actual Bill intro date. I had the thought too that perhaps it was in the works prior, but a Dem introducing it made me reconsider that possibility. .... but then again..... maybe so.
I had not seen that bit about the “Wait to die” interpretation. Wow!
Thanks again.