Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q Anon: 11/21/18 Trust Trump's Plan
qmap.pub ^ | 11/21/18 | FReepers, vanity

Posted on 11/21/2018 10:09:57 PM PST by ransomnote

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 1,981-1,984 next last
To: Jack Black

Texokie posted that panic in DC. I only recopied it, so that people could see what I was asking about.

What I asked was if anyone could think of some other title besides HRC EMAIL CASE. Something more descriptive of the seriousness of what she had done.

I don’t give two hoots and a holler about Panic in DC. Whatever your complaint or opinion is, I’m sure that it is 100% accurate. So you just need to go prepare for the dastardly results of whatever you think will happen.


741 posted on 11/24/2018 4:28:14 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 640 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

742 posted on 11/24/2018 4:28:29 PM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. (Psalm 32:12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 739 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; TEXOKIE; bagster
DECEPTION BYTES:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpcmp5ffY0I

RUSSIA IS COMING. THEY ARE COMING" says Migrant Spokesperson in the caravan.

All about bringing in the NWO . . . sweeping aside Mexican Constitutional law.

Mexico signed everything for Agenda 30--same for Chili.

743 posted on 11/24/2018 4:30:46 PM PST by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE

He was on multiple committees in the Senate that approved Hillary’s Uranium One sellout of the country, as I understand it. I do believe, like most of Congress, he is compromised—and thus was effectively neutered in this AG role.


744 posted on 11/24/2018 4:31:06 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE
I was simply bringing to the thread an interesting possible scenario from Bongino I had not heard here yet: that there is some talk of him seeking his Senate seat once more in 2020.

Wait, Texy. I said Sessions would run for the derp Alabama Senate seat WAY before Bongino did. Right after he resigned. Check the historical record.

Of course he'll run. And he'll win. And here's another tidbit for others. Senators do not "recuse".

Bongino is a child.

Bagster


745 posted on 11/24/2018 4:48:18 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
Are you aware of any signs of Panic in D.C.?

Everything they do, every article, every statement, every desperate effort to get Whjtaker to recuse, among other things, is a sign of PANIC IN DC.

Just yesterday Comey issued a tweet stating he wouldn't testify behind close doors as subpoenaed to do. Another sign. Pay attention, Jacky-soi. The signs are all around you, unless you are intent on carrying the water of the derp state, as you are prone to do.

Now, it's your turn.

Give us the evidence of Loreta Lynch playing golf.

p.s. I thought you were self-exiled from this thread?

Bagster


746 posted on 11/24/2018 4:55:07 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 640 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Senators don’t “recuse”, but they do “abstain”. If Session retakes his seat, let’s hope he doesn’t do that.


747 posted on 11/24/2018 4:59:05 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Did I just get slammed for a mistake I made in misreading an earlier post?


748 posted on 11/24/2018 5:00:18 PM PST by John4.11 (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies]

To: ez

Hillary’s Classified Document Dump.
****************************************************************************
That may be the winner so far.


749 posted on 11/24/2018 5:00:49 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies]

To: JockoManning

HRC SECRETS SALES
HRC SECRETS-FOR-FEES SERVER
***************************************************************************
Promising for sure.


750 posted on 11/24/2018 5:02:13 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes

Hillary’s Classified Document Dump.
****************************************************************************
That may be the winner so far.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“ blushing”. Thank You.
I’m a lyricist in my secret life. It has multiple meanings.


751 posted on 11/24/2018 5:14:45 PM PST by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
Instead of the HRC Email case it should be referred to as the HRC Espionage case, because the law she violated is the Espionage act. Here's some background::

Wikipedia article on the Espionage Act of 1917

Article: Hillary violated the Espionage Act from the Conservative Daily News

And this article from the excellent author Greg Jarrett, who is also a Fox News contributor: Did Comey obstruct justice by protecting Hillary Clinton from prosecution?

Pretty much ties it up with a bow!

Happy Thanksgiving!

752 posted on 11/24/2018 5:22:13 PM PST by Jack Black ("If you believe in things that you don't understand than you suffer" - "Superstition",Stevie Wonder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 741 | View Replies]

To: haffast


Leaked Top Secret GCHQ Memo. FISA Abuse?

Speaking of The British Intelligence (GCHQ)

Former FBI agent Hal Turner, leaked top secret GCHQ document related to the FISA Abuse Memo. It is titled
 "TOP SECRET STRAP3 SIGINT UK EYES ONLY". Alleged top secret GCHQ document at 
https://i.postimg.cc/HL92w6fM/GCHQ-Top-Secret-Memo-Susan-Rice-Requested-Spying-On-Trump.pngPNG

The British Intelligence (GCHQ) document shows that on August 28, 2016 the former President Obama, 
requested that GCHQ do surveillance of American citizens and American business on American soil. 
Called “Operation FULSOME”. Without a U.S. Search Warrant or Court Order. Invading your personal privacy 
is a federal crime punishable with prison, violated wiretap laws and your Constitutional protections. All 
of the above was before Trump was elected. A presidential candidate.

Source and details at https://www.minds.com/blog/view/801991857799499776

(BITT- I JUST COPIED IT, I CAN'T CERTIFY THAT LETTER..BUT IT LOOKS DIFFERENT THAN THE ONE DEBUNKED LONG AGO...)

753 posted on 11/24/2018 5:23:18 PM PST by bitt ("Let justice be done though the heavens fall".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies]

To: bagster
Pay attention Jacky-soi

Ok, still with the name calling, eh? I usually avoid that sort of thing, but seeing as it's part of the rules on this thread to nick-name people I guess I can play too.

754 posted on 11/24/2018 5:25:31 PM PST by Jack Black ("If you believe in things that you don't understand than you suffer" - "Superstition",Stevie Wonder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 746 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty

Owl / Y symbols, head symbols

What it “Y” symbol?


755 posted on 11/24/2018 5:25:59 PM PST by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 672 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Senators don’t “recuse”, but they do “abstain”. If Session retakes his seat, let’s hope he doesn’t do that.

With all due respect, this is a ridiculous line of reasoning. What would Sessions find it necessary to "abstain" on. Which particular votes? And why?

Does Romney need to abstain from certain votes because he once ran for President? Did McCain? Rubio? The list goes on.

It's time to put the Sessions hate to bed. He holds no office at the moment. Done is done, can't be undone.

Bagster


756 posted on 11/24/2018 5:26:09 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 747 | View Replies]

To: John4.11
Did I just get slammed for a mistake I made in misreading an earlier post?

Slammed? By who?

If so, I recommend slamming back.

Bagster


757 posted on 11/24/2018 5:27:45 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 748 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

758 posted on 11/24/2018 5:30:55 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]

To: bagster

The Dems would try anything. Nothing needs to have precedent of specific constitutionality to it.

I bet you, if he’s elected, they’ll try it.


759 posted on 11/24/2018 5:31:26 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 756 | View Replies]

To: bagster

I have no desire to slam back. I’m just here to learn at the feet if those who have been at this a lot longer than I have.


760 posted on 11/24/2018 5:32:29 PM PST by John4.11 (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 757 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 1,981-1,984 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson