To: bagster
The House and Senate have the ability to not accept new members.
If any newly elected members (that includes re-elected members) are implicated before the start of the next session (Jan2?), the respective chamber can choose NOT to seat them.
1,725 posted on
11/21/2018 5:09:36 AM PST by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
If any newly elected members (that includes re-elected members) Ah HA.
Good to know. Thanks, Cletus.
Bagster
1,739 posted on
11/21/2018 5:37:57 AM PST by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
If any newly elected members (that includes re-elected members) are implicated before the start of the next session (Jan2?), the respective chamber can choose NOT to seat them. Does this mean that the CURRENT members (GOP majority) can choose not to seat the implicated incoming members?
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
The House and Senate have the ability to not accept new members.
If any newly elected members (that includes re-elected members) are implicated before the start of the next session (Jan2?), the respective chamber can choose NOT to seat them. I still think you are right to remind folks of this. Whether it is used, or not, remains to be seen. I certainly think the odds are better than 55% that such might eventuate. What to you think the odds are--assuming that convincing evidence of serious guilt about horrific crimes are published beforehand?
1,845 posted on
11/21/2018 9:31:01 AM PST by
JockoManning
(http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson