With all due respect, potna, a.) you're not the boss of me, so I won't be told what or what not to do, and b.) What are you talking about? I didn't put any words in your mouth.
I asked you a question. The question was, and is, what do you expect to see reported in ANY format. It was rhetorical. The answer is nothing. You will not see anything EVER reported about NSA capabilities or any high tech solutions to vote tampering.
You should know that. Again, with all due respect, you have to have a little bit of intellectual sophistication to connect certain dots and know some things without being told. Nobody had to tell me that spies don't advertise, for example.
And yet you want it printed in your newspaper and deliverd to your front porch.
when in fact those were words posted by Q.
Refresh my memory on what words Q posted publicly?
And remember. Discussion by posters on this board, 8chan or YouTubers is not Q.
If he's going to say them publicly, sometime soon after would be a good time to put up or shut up.
Like I told another anti-Trump, wobbly poster here earlier, asking Q to "put up or shut up" is the same thing as asking Trump to "put up or shut up. But I notice some people can't seem to make that leap.
Let this sink in. Q delivers Trump's message. Any action taken regarding election fraud, swamp draining, etc has been, is, and will always be, taken by the TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. Q is part of that administration.
It's a simple concept, but important. Anyone that has a "problem" with Q either a.) Thinks Q is a Larp, in which case why would you even talk about Q in the first place, or b.) has a "problem" with Trump.
It's really as simple as that.
It would accrue favorably for him. :)
I think I may have identified part of the problem. You refer to Q as "him". We usually do the same thing, but we understand that Q is a team of high ranking military intelligence Officers and others that work for and advise the President. Calling Q "him" is shorthand so we don't have to type all that out every time we refer to the operation/team.
So maybe if you stopped thinking in terms of "him" it would help you understand things better?
Also, it's not necessary that Q "accrues favorably" with you. Many people, patriots otherwise, are incapable of "expanding their thinking" for one reason or another. I could write a book on that one. The Donald won't be able to red-pill every patriot, more's the pity. But it sure would help him MAGA. And he could use the help.
Now, I'm taking you at your word that you're not a "troll" like those other two knuckleheads pissing on the thread, and that's why I'm talking to you in the first place.
And I don't mean to be rude, merely blunt. There are some things that need to be understood.
Good evening.
p.s. Remember, I said "with all due respect" (more than once, so you can't get mad).
Bagster