Replies

>> Another positive to add to your list - we have 2 conservative Supreme Court Justices that we wouldn’t have if HRC had won.

Great point! How did I manage to forget that?!

I notice on several of the election sites I’ve watched that they jumped the gun to prematurely call states for D, but completely drag their feet to call them for R. Notice that? What does that tell me? A few things:

1. Either the Media is still DS controlled or else Q team wants it to appear that way.
2. Assuming DS control, that seems to indicate that they were confident those early calls were “in the bag”. The foot-dragging in not calling states for R seems to indicate that those states were supposed to be “in the bag” for D, and maybe they are a bit confused that it was taking so long to turn blue? Maybe something there was not going according to the DS plan?

I think it would be interesting to do an analysis of when each state was called (and by whom) and what percentage of the vote had been counted and what the totals were. The most obvious and glaring (to me) was calling Virginia for D with less than 2% of the vote counted and R in the lead by ~70% to 25%. How do you explain that?

Maybe such an analysis would point us to some races with fraudulent fixes. (Or maybe they are all more fraudulent than even I have imagined and that would only point us to where some of the biggest frauds are.)

There seem to be multiple theories floating around this morning. I see this as the fog of war, the recovery and confusion after a major battle. We are all regrouping and assessing the situation. Our assessments will change as new information becomes available and as we give the situation more thought.

The top theories that I’ve observed are:

1. This is a disaster. We lost the House. The plan is lost or at least in disarray. This will be impossible to recover from. Or at least extremely difficult. Woe is me.
2. This is not good. We lost the House. Q team has a Plan B for this. We need to move to Plan B and continue to support Q/Trump and trust the Plan.
3. This is not good, but it was completely expected. Q/Trump planned for this and although they would have preferred to win the House, this is NOT a disaster. Repeat: This was expected. Not to worry.
4. This is excellent. Trump/Q lost the House on purpose. We should be happy about this.

My opinions on the above:

1. I refuse to believe this. No plan as thorough as the Q plan would have been destroyed by an entirely foreseeable possibility like this. Any sane person would have a contingency plan. So I completely reject #1 as a viable theory. 0%
2. Foreseeable outcome has been planned for. Plan B now in effect. 10%
3. Expected by Q. Completely planned for. Not only planned for but the plan will take advantage of this in many ways. For example: Traps were laid to catch perps committing massive election fraud. Losses in the House were designed to give the Ds a false sense of security. Etc., etc., etc. 89%
4. Hard for me to believe that it would be intentional. The only way I can imagine it is (and maybe my imagination is just insufficient at this time) is if the Q team needed this in order to catch perps in current crimes which the possible 0vomit pardons of the past would not cover and to keep the DS actors off guard. 1%

YMMV.