So you do not believe that victims have a right to know where their attacker is living, even though the attacker is given their victims home and work addresses, ostensibly so the attacker can stay away from the person they victimized?
The problem the amendment was not the Marcy’s Law reference. The problem was that the amendment promoters stuffed two additional factors unrelated to Marcy’s Law. It’s precisely the kind of “promotion” that makes ballot initiatives abhorrent to some of us. The other two parts of the amendment were:
- Increase the judicial retirement age from 70 to 75 years of age; and
- Prohibit state courts from deferring to an administrative agency’s interpretation of a state statute or rule in lawsuits.