The problem the amendment was not the Marcy’s Law reference. The problem was that the amendment promoters stuffed two additional factors unrelated to Marcy’s Law. It’s precisely the kind of “promotion” that makes ballot initiatives abhorrent to some of us. The other two parts of the amendment were:
- Increase the judicial retirement age from 70 to 75 years of age; and
- Prohibit state courts from deferring to an administrative agency’s interpretation of a state statute or rule in lawsuits.
Okay, now your objection becomes more clear, and I can see why you object. Thanks for the clarification. 8>)