Why Some Scientists Say Global Warming Is Out and Global Cooling Is In

In a world riddled with climate-change doomsday predictions, a small but growing number of scientists are saying the highly touted climate models predicting steadily increasing global temperature due to humans’ carbon-dioxide emissions are wrong and that Earth could soon face something even more dire: global cooling.

One such climate scientist is Valentina Zharkova, an astrophysicist at Northumbria University in the United Kingdom. Zharkova and her team of researchers say that based on mathematical models of the Sun’s magnetic activity, it’s likely Earth will experience decreasing magnetic waves over a 33-year period beginning in 2021.

Zharkova is not alone. In 2017, researchers at the Physical Meteorological Observatory Davos, the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, ETH Zurich, and the University of Bern published a model projecting a cooling period “in 50 to 100 years’ time.” Numerous other studies have made similar projections. Indeed, the website NoTricksZone lists hundreds of peer-reviewed papers that argue solar activity and solar cycles have a substantial influence on global climate change on decadal, century-long, and millennial time scales. Some of these papers even argue that solar activity is often the dominant factor driving climate change.

The researchers say reduced solar magnetic activity has previously been linked to historically cool periods in Earth’s history, such as the Maunder Minimum, a period of lower magnetic activity associated with a “mini ice age” that occurred from 1645 to 1715. During the Maunder Minimum, temperatures plummeted to such an extreme degree that Londoners held “frost fairs” on the frozen Thames River.

Writing for the New York Times, historian Geoffrey Parker notes, “The unusual cold that lasted from the 1620s until the 1690s included ice on both the Bosporus

Everyone forgets the biggest determinant of Earth's climate is this nuclear fireball 93 million miles away called the Sun. If the Sun goes into a quiet period, the result would be disastrous for agriculture since growing seasons will be much shorter around the world. Hope people like eating more wheat products, because it will really cut into rice production.

The researchers say reduced solar magnetic activity has previously been linked to historically cool periods in Earth’s history

This has been known for CENTURIES already. The globull warming alarmists have been so full of shat it's scary.

Us ham radio guys have known this too. Cooler periods during a Maunder Minimum also translates to less longwave activity which is why people like me SCREAM every time some globull warming alarmist insists the planet is warming and we're "science deniers."

The real science deniers are the globull warming alarmists!!!

The version I heard of that joke:

Three people sitting around and the subject comes up, what’s the most amazing invention ever, and the blond says “thermos”. And she explains: “It keeps hot things hot and cold things cold.... But how does it know?”

Never published it professionally. A physics professor from Toronto approached me and asked questions as it was making sense to him. I don’t care if people believe it or not. I seek to understand life for my own use, my identity does not depend upon other people agreeing with me.

I just find it humorous that here is is, 25 years later and they are now saying the same thing.

I communicated for several weeks with a astrophysicist who specialized in the magnetic fields and density of planetary objects. It was very enlightening as it helped me to understand why the sun reverses polarity every 11 years while the earth does it about every 75,000 years.

The model I developed showed that the pattern shift of the magnetic north pole representing the axis of the earth’s core when compared to the geographic North Pole caused a greater dynamo output when at greatest opposition and a decreased dynamo output when aligned as it is currently.

The reason for the temperature change is that the decreased opposition of the poles, causing a decreased dynamo output, caused a weaker polarity and weaker magnetosphere. The decreased magnetosphere allows for increased solar radiation and thus global warming.

The reverse is also true in that a stronger magnetosphere results in decreased solar radiation and increased cooling.

Thus the periods of warming and cooling are functions of the greater solar environment. The answers to the earth question is a function of the answer to the question, “Why does the sun reverse polarity every 11 years?” What greater environmental influence causes this? Is it the location of our solar system within the bands of the Milky Way Galaxy?

I do not pretend to know the answer as every answered question leads to twenty more unanswered questions.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.