All the ARRESTS NOW SCREAMERS need to read this VERY slowly and carefully. And if, after a close analysis, they still scream for ARRESTS NOW then they are retarded and a hindrance to the operation.
Q explains the Mueller stuff most excellently. If anybody still thinks that, after thinking about this, Mueller is possibly a "white hat", then see above. And, as we know, if Mueller is a black hat, then so is [RR].
All this stuff is really common sense, logical thinking, if one just stops to analyze what's going on. And it should have been apparent from the start.
I really love this post. Too bad we aren't allowed to post "Q crap" on the general FR forum. This just might make some people see things as they truly are.
And the blue-pilled, non-engaged population should have this force fed to them.
But the matrix is easy, I guess.
Oh, well.
Time will reveal all.
#ThereIsNoSpoon
Bagster
Q explains the Mueller stuff most excellently. If anybody still thinks that, after thinking about this, Mueller is possibly a “white hat”, then see above. And, as we know, if Mueller is a black hat, then so is [RR].
For your consideration:
We know that Q has said if Mueller is a black hat then RR is a black hat and vice versa. That seemingly ties them together as one or the other. Agreed?
We also know that Q has said that disinformation is necessary. Agreed?
Here is thought I had this morning
What if the derps know that Mueller is a black hat, but were cautious about RR and the whole thing about tying them together, one way or the other, was disinformation to buy time for the sting? Or perhaps RR had been leveraged (now removed) and tying them together kept the derps from catching on. If the derps thought both are on their side while in reality RR was working for the good guys, then we have a mole in the enemy camp.
Just a thought, but since disinformation is sometimes necessary, the whole RR/Mueller being the same (one way or the other) could be disinformation itself.
Excellent explanation! Only a derp wouldn't get it now.
I get most of my news on the Q threads, but I venture out into the rest of the world (MSM) every so often to see what I’m missing and what the enemy is saying.
It sounds like Hitlery is panicking.
https://twitter.com/camanpour/status/1049653918945501184
Exclusive: @HillaryClinton says you cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about.
Is she encouraging leftards to be violent? Sure sounds like it to me .... but with enough ambiguity to give her legal cover against “inciting a riot” or something similar.