“Q explains the Mueller stuff most excellently. If anybody still thinks that, after thinking about this, Mueller is possibly a “white hat”, then see above. And, as we know, if Mueller is a black hat, then so is [RR].”
For your consideration:
We know that Q has said if Mueller is a black hat then RR is a black hat and vice versa. That seemingly ties them together as one or the other. Agreed?
We also know that Q has said that disinformation is necessary. Agreed?
Here is thought I had this morning
What if the derps know that Mueller is a black hat, but were cautious about RR and the whole thing about tying them together, one way or the other, was disinformation to buy time for the sting? Or perhaps RR had been leveraged (now removed) and tying them together kept the derps from catching on. If the derps thought both are on their side while in reality RR was working for the good guys, then we have a mole in the enemy camp.
Just a thought, but since disinformation is sometimes necessary, the whole RR/Mueller being the same (one way or the other) could be disinformation itself.
Thank you for saying this. I have never been comfortable with the accepted notion that the Mueller=RR status is guaranteed. Like you say, disinformation is part of Q. I think this is the part that keeps a lot of us on the fence about whether Mueller and RR are white or black hats. The premise that they have to be the same might not be valid.
Of course you could be right. Words are words.
And sometimes words are wind.
We just pawns in game of life.
#TrumpKnows
The statement that Q made that:
RM=RR .AND. RR=RM I regard as being possible disinformation. Just not at all sure of it.
It is also possible that RM .AND. RR are one of the Red Octobers. I suspect that there are quite a few Red Octobers.