“It was all part of the coaching to make her sound vulnerable “
I don’t know if it’s true or not, but I have a feeling Alyssa Milano was in DC for a reason, i.e., to give acting lessons.
“I don’t know if it’s true or not,”
Please note. I am not condemning her for being coached, prepped and and aided before the interview. It is part of the legal game. I would expect nothing less. It would not surprise me if the somewhat frumpy dress, the oversized glasses, the rumpled hair, the plain make-up were all carefully selected for the visual impact. They were trying to make her look trustworthy and vulnerable. I think the coaching and “Witness Preparation” were a little too heavy handed and it showed. The only other option is that they didn’t manage her answers and appearance at all and I don’t believe that happened. The whole look was carefully choreographed but it did quite work as they wanted it too.
I do think that the Democrat team overplayed their hand with the visuals. Ms. Ford came across as slightly weird rather than relatable and a large part of that was the physical appearance and the voice.
Her voice was totally faked as were her mannerisms. She was coached by professionals. Her statements have so many holes, she should be charged with perjury. Never happen though will it.
Milano giving acting lessons to Ford, otherway around.
This is the real face of Christine Blasey Ford caught in a very brief unguarded moment.
Gone are soft focus lenses, the slack jawed bewildered expression, the pretty pose, poor widdle girl. This is the sharp multi-degreed behavioral expert knowing she nailed her on camera performance.