Q Anon: 09/26/18 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 09/26/18 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

	“Trust The Plan”
YouTube	President Trump	This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube	Joe Masepoes	Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction
Threadreader	Jason Wright	Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Threadreader	ImperatorRex	A thread on how Team Trump is preparing the normies for what is coming: major Swamp Draining. - overview
Twitter	Paul Serran	What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Article	Sundance	Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview
Thread	Martin Geddes	WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
	“Pay Attention”
Thread	Qmap.pub	Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread	Qanon.app	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Thread	Qanonposts.com	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Website	We-go-all.net	Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website	Qntmpkts.keybase.pub	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
	“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread	Anonymous	QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Oracles	Bagster	Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread
Lexicon	Swordmaker	LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website	Whitehouse	Whitehouse.gov - President Trump's Executive Orders, Proclamations, Nominations, WH press briefings and news
Website	FBI	vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Website	State Dept.	foia.state.gov - Virtual Reading Room Documents Search
Table	Anonymous	Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
	“Power to the People”
YouTube	Praying Medic	Series of videos explaining Q-drops
Twitter	Praying Medic	Immediate reactions to Q-drops
YouTube	Dustin Nemos	Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links
Twitter	ImperatorRex	Includes Q-drop reactions
Twitter	Neonrevolt	Includes highly detailed, investigative Q-drop reactions
Thread	SkyPilot	Story of Q - collection of Q information
	“Silent Majority No More”
Website	White House	Email the White House with your support and suggestions
Website	Congress	Email Congress with your support and suggestions
Website	roserambles.org	Q Cards
Thread	Little Jeremiah	Memes
	“Fight, Fight, Fight!”
YouTube	President Reagan	A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images
YouTube	President Kennedy	The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies

[truthluva]

I think those were current pics Q posted back in February. The Google Earth pics you found show construction to the right of the building in the Q pic with some other small red-roof buildings at the entrance. In the August 2017 GE pic none of that is there. In the April 2018 GE pic the construction is complete and the red-roof buildings are there.

I think Q was posting pics that had been taken about the same time as they were posted.

I have been searching for a travel itenirary for her for January/February 2018, but have yet to find anything.

[bitt]

done

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3691752/posts

[LucyT]

Here’s this, can’t verify:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?104440-Kavanaugh-Hearings-a-National-Disgrace&p=1251197&posted=1#post1251197

Re: Kavanaugh Hearings a National Disgrace

Can you tell us where you got that info, Enigma3, or provide any links?
If true, especially that Ford is CIA, it certainly puts a very different slant on the situation.

I don’t understand how it is that the 3rd party allegedly in the room at the time, whose last name is Judge, has not been required to testify.
Of course the fact that he and Kavanaugh were friends could very well affect his testimony, but at least there would be the opportunity to form an opinion about whether he is a reliable source or not.

I didn’t have a feeling one way or another about Ford’s testimony, but having been a rape victim myself, I can certainly say without reservation that if she truly was a victim, the last thing she would want to be doing was testifying before the whole world about her experience, unless she felt a moral obligation.
On the other hand, if she is CIA, all bets are off.

I thought Kavanaugh’s behavior did not recommend him as a potential Supreme Court judge.

Portraying himself as a victim is unwise and only creates more of a victim mindset, and the amount of evasiveness and sheer whining on his part was embarrassing, imho.

Clarence Thomas was a disgrace as a Supreme Court Judge, and with Kavanaugh’s past record of voting against women’s rights and the environment, I think he will not be better.

Quote Posted by enigma3 (here)
The back story to this is quite interesting.

1. A parent of Kavanaugh’s (a judge) ruled against a parent of Ford’s in a court hearing many moons ago.

2. An internet blogger stated that Christine Ford is currently (amongst other things) an undergrad CIA recruiter at Stanford.

3. That which was scrubbed from Ford’s yearbooks indicates that she and her cohorts were hard partiers in high school and got very drunk on occasion.
4. Both Ford’s parents are/were CIA assets.

5. The goodie #1. The CIA under Gina Haspel noted a big upsurge in traffic between two of its secret bases. Supposedly she/CIA captured all the chatter and determined that a rogue element within the CIA (still haven’t cleaned it out yet) is behind the Kavanaugh attacks. She then confided this information to Trump and Grassley. Shortly thereafter Grassley called for a vote to send the nomination to the full Senate.

6. Goodie #2. Q has stated that the Dems tried to bargain the Kavanaugh seat by trading a yes on Kavanaugh for not releasing the unredacted FISA pages. That was summarily rejected by Trump et all.

One of the major problems I have with this is that the Dems have had some of this information and sat on it for at least 3 months. That doesn’t exactly smell like above board ethics. It just plain smells.

As has been stated elsewhere, the accusers have brought NO corroboration for any of these charges. In fact, the 4 people Ford brought up have all issued statements that the events as described by Ford did not happen. Ford did state that one person witnessed the party. She is a close friend, so rather biased.

Finally, the woman prosecutor who questioned Ford later told the 51 Republicans in the Senate that she would never bring the case to trial for - wait for the boom - lack of evidence. Not even enough evidence to ask for a search warrant!

[Steven W.]

I found the original and posted that on front page of FR

BREAKING: Maryland State re Judge K - No Case Ever Filed + 1 YEAR Statute of Limitations EXPIRED

[AZLiberty]

Does he ask for donations?

Webb takes donations. Also, during his Q&A sessions he uses some software that prioritizes questions by the amount you pay to submit the question.

[Steven W.]

thx! BOOM :)

[numberonepal]

Here's a crumb or two:

[AZLiberty]

Scott Adams, in a video this afternoon, thinks that in the "FBI Investigation Affair", the Democrats lost, *by* only asking for a one-week delay, and that Ford is at "slightly" greater risk than Kavanaugh of something turning up.

First time around I wrote "but" instead of "by".

[philman_36]

So anybody declaring that the statute of limitations was still in affect is either practicing disinformation or is simply ignorant.

I'm going with disinformation in an effort to advance a political agenda

[ichabod1]

Because he was a Bushie!

[aMorePerfectUnion]

I don’t NT know more...

But I hope Trump has set a trap here.

[Wneighbor]

Honestly, I think there was more than that. But I’ll need to find my notes or revisit a search.

[stylin19a]

your lips to God’s ear...

[philman_36]

Oh no! I didn’t have my “.” /pregnancy test impression

[pa_dweller]

Ah. Thanks.

[blu]

Thanks for the link to the post about fraud. Too bad everyone in Washington is so busy being butt buddies that nothing will come of it.

also saw tonight that the doxxing was traced to a computer in Mad Maxine’s office. Don’t even bother wasting a molecule considering the implications...nothing will be done.

[xone]

gisd O

[ransomnote]

generally: What if.....

the whole Kavanaugh hearing was designed to show the public that both Ds and Rs are corrupt and that we’ve all been duped and controlled by the DS for decades....

____________________________

My 2 cents:

President Trump will have yet another example of dirty R's shortly; Rod Rosenstein is a Republican. There's no need to prove that Republican's can be dirty - conservatives have been screaming about their congress critters for some time now. The harder task for Trump is to take down the government swamp without revealing that approximately 70% are dirty. He wants to maintain the public's confidence and build the Republican brand, choosing a deep state SC won't help him do that.

_____________________________

generally:....and to encourage both D and R voters to come out and vote for Trump’s picks?

_____________________________

My 2 cents:

Trump picked Kavanaugh for SC, and has gone on record for lauding the honesty of Kavanaugh.(2275)

If, per your theory, Trump picked Kavanaugh to demonstrate both R's and D's are corrupt, that wouldn't, "encourage both D and R voters to come out for Trump's picks." If anything, it would damage Trump's credibility regarding any other picks. Winning and knowing whom to trust with the republic is what builds Trump's brand.

_____________________________

generally: 4. Read all the Q posts about K. Nowhere does Q explicitly state that he is pro-K. He does say “Justice K confirmation” and we, of course, assume that that means that Q is pro-K.

_____________________________

My 2 cents:

Q is implicitly pro Kavanaugh. Q is pro Trump and Trump is pro Kavanaugh. Q has spelled out that Kavanaugh's confirmation is followed by [RR] removal. Q has hi-lighted the fact that Kavanaugh is in agreement with military tribunal law and is therefore part of Trump's plan. Q has focused on the madness/panic of deep staters throughout this process as they violently oppose Kavanaugh, causing damage to the Dem brand in their desperation. Q says, those who scream the loudest....

I don't believe Trump would stack the court with a deep state person in order to "bring down" the court. He's focused on D5/Declas right now and the SC needs to be stable and honest for his plans and timing. Why would he choose to jeopardize all present planning by inserting a dirty justice for life (only to pull him down as a "bad choice") when he can just continue dismantling the swamp methodically per the plan by inserting an honest one?

_____________________________

generally: What if....

Q/Trump want K confirmed for some reason? To bring down a wholly corrupt SCOTUS? To enable impeachment of K and certain other Justices?

_____________________________

My 2 cents:

Trump wants to drain the swamp - confirming a swamp creature would be stocking it. Trump is so good at dismantling subtly that people have trust issues fearing nothing is happening, so I don't see him pulling apart the SC with impeachment of K, his choice whom he lauds as honest, and "other justices."

In short, I see all this in a light that is opposed to the theory that Kavanaugh is DS and that Trump would pick him and promote his honesty.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Q

[Disestablishmentarian]

Webb is beyond unreliable. I think he is the American version of DEBKAfile. Has a single one of his great “Scoops” proven true?

Contrast this with Q, where dozens of improbable intelligence drops have been verified as the months go by. (My favorite, lately, was the emphasis on Big Tech companies and their CEOs before anyone else was paying attention, even down to predicting the recent DoJ antitrust action against).

I am convinced Webb is not really an independent agent, and is not to be trusted.