Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Informal Poll - Women Only (sorry guys!)
moi

Posted on 09/22/2018 7:41:05 AM PDT by blu

This is an formal survey. Gents, you'll see why it's women only.

Ladies, it doesn't matter if you believe Dr. Ford or not.

Do you think she is asking for extra special handling because she is a woman?

Do you think she is being treated differently because she is a woman?

You can say if you believe her or not, but the real questions are above.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: kavenaugh; sexism; truth; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: blu
I am beyond furious!

This woman is a willing tool of the democrats to delay, delay, delay.

The Republicans seem to believe that if they are too "harsh", they'll lose the women's vote in the mid-terms. Baloney! We're not stupid! We see what they're doing. They'll lose NO votes they wouldn't lose anyway. Vote already! Get on with it!!

41 posted on 09/22/2018 9:17:03 AM PDT by Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu

Yes and yes.

I’m sick of women lodging false accusations against people and then hiding behind the victim label.


42 posted on 09/22/2018 9:18:39 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu

She is doing what she is told by Democrat operatives. The correct questions are:

1. Do you think she is asking for extra special handling because she is a woman?

Wrong question. S/B Do you think the Republicans are cowering and pandering to her absurd requests for special handling because she is a woman?

No, I think they are more afraid of Democrats than their own voters. It don’t know if it’s a database/blackmail thing or just spinelessness.

2. Do you think she is being treated differently because she is a woman?

No, she is being treated differently because the media will pounce on them if they don’t treat her differently. Women are the same as men, except when they can use their sex to emasculate honorable people.

This has nothing to do with womanhood, feminism, or discrimmination, it has to do with the use of political correctness by criminals to intimidate non criminals.


43 posted on 09/22/2018 9:19:27 AM PDT by gspurlock (http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Yes, she is saying women are weak and fragile and being groped by a teenage boy is enough to ruin a woman’s life.

I'm much older now, but have lived long enough to be chased, propositioned, pinned against a wall and even jumped from the bushes (police were called on that one). None of these traumatized me or made me fragile. In fact I learned early how to use my knee and upper cut. I have been a tough cookie sometimes. If this ruined her life she wasn't very stable to begin with. What a crock... Just one old gals perspective.

44 posted on 09/22/2018 9:21:13 AM PDT by Bearshouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blu
Do you think she is asking for extra special handling because she is a woman?

No I think she is asking for extra special handling because she is a liberal. They can never take a punch although they throw enough of them.

Do you think she is being treated differently because she is a woman?

By republicans yes. They tend to treat special interest groups with kid gloves because they don't want the cocktail circlet to call them names or worse yet, not be invited to those parties with the cool kids. Sadly the GOPe never left middle school emotionally.

Now by the media, it does not matter. If Chuck Norris was a liberal and had the opportunity to stick it to a mildly conservative nominee then they would be just as quick to scream about how you are picking on the poor little boy.

45 posted on 09/22/2018 9:26:44 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Somewhere there's danger, somewhere there's injustice, and somewhere else the tea is getting cold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu

Do you think she is asking for extra special handling because she is a woman?

Yes, I do.

Do you think she is being treated differently because she is a woman?

There’s no doubt in my mind that she is being treated differently than a man would be treated but also because she’s a Democrat.

I also lived through the 80s and if every girl from that era who had been groped (if that even happened) was traumatized, the entire country would have ground to a halt.


46 posted on 09/22/2018 9:34:35 AM PDT by Gingersnap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu

Can I vote too? Please?

47 posted on 09/22/2018 9:39:59 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu

Been around the block. This is Clarence Thomas all over again. Ironically that’s the day I knew I would never ever vote democrat. So that event made me a conservative forever. I hope it has the same effect on young women. I really think it will have an effect on young men.


48 posted on 09/22/2018 10:55:11 AM PDT by Donnafrflorida (Thru Him all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu

She should be slapped down for her attempt to disgrace an outstanding and exemplary man. She is being heard and supported because so many people have been brainwashed for so long in the Demorat’s VICTIMIZATION drive. People are caught up in the tide because decency and respect for achievement and proper behavior no longer have value against the constant hammering of immorality, sensationalism, and outright fixation on anything and everything sexual.
Yes she is being treated as someone special regardless of having NO VALIDITY to her story because she is a woman and because she is a Democrat woman. She is disgusting!
Going beyond the clever phrasing that 24% of women believe her, when will people stop and think? Women are about half the population so that makes 50%. Of the 50% of the population lets be generous and say 25% believe her. Do the math. 12 1/2 % believe her. She is a loser on both ends. She is way down in the minority of the total general population and 76% of women DON’T BELIEVE HER!
She is a lying piece of scum who sees fame and fortune in the same manner as Kaepernick or whatever his name is.
She should be sued for defamation and hounded to within an inch of her teeth. How are future generations going to be taught what is right when goons like her make it the easy way?


49 posted on 09/22/2018 11:23:24 AM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu

No to the first. She’s asking because she can. More likely it’s because she’s a Dem.

Yes to the second, if you are asking if she’s being treated differently as compared to her accuser.

People have lost respect for their own and others’ reputations. Perhaps we should bring back dueling.


50 posted on 09/22/2018 11:31:10 AM PDT by microgeek42 (lurker no more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bearshouse

As a tough old gal myself I agree.


51 posted on 09/22/2018 11:41:01 AM PDT by McGavin999 ("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jeffersons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: blu

Do you think she is asking for extra special handling because she is a woman?

Yes, she is asking for extra special handling because she is a “democrat” first and secondly a “woman”. Yet it is not up to her to set the rules or the date and time of the hearing where she will be given a chance to be heard and she must speak first as she is making the accusations and he is there to respond to the accusations against him. If she doesn’t go first there are no specifics for the committee to base their questions to him on which means he cannot reply to any specifics that might be told by her.

Do you think she is being treated differently because she is a woman?

No, I think they are trying to treat her fairly, as an equal to men and that they would give a man the same consideration to be heard and allow a small delay if reasonably requested. I think the desire for different treatment is a democrat ploy and that the GOP worry not about the base so much as the independents, who may be emotionally affected by democrat theatrics and not vote GOP in the upcoming elections. I hope the GOP does not completely fold and let the dems and her run the hearing, as it is their hearing to set the rules for and not hers and hers alone as the dems are trying to make it.

You can say if you believe her or not, but the real questions are above.

I think her accusations are motivated by TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) and her being a fervent Roe v. Wade Supporter. Did something happen to her, when she was 15 years old? Maybe, yes, then again maybe no. If it did happen, was it Brett Kavanaugh, who did it? In her mind, yes, but in reality, probably not. It maybe a false memory that is motivated by her political ire. We will know is she lectures about such things rather then staying with the facts only.

The dems say that woman don’t lie about sexual assaults. Why they just say women, I don’t know, seems sexist to me. But, yes, there are some women who do, mentally ill women and those that have emotional problems and are given to delusion have lied about such things and many want the attention (or cash) they garner from it. That said, she needs to respond to the committee’s offer to be heard and come forward, say her peace, be heard and let the chips fly one way or another. Either she is believable or not; same with him. Upsetting the schedule of the hearings is unacceptable as it appears to be a ploy by the democrats to destabilize the nomination procedure.

As for her speaking second which would is the respondent position, rather then first which is the position of the accuser, that makes NO SENSE, as the specifics of the accusation need to be told by the accuser and known to the committee so they can ask him accurate questions to the specifics she gives them. Yes, the committee will respond to her accusations by asking her questions, so they can use her answers to format the appropriate questions to ask him. What she wants is for everyone, but her and her attorneys, to blindly enter into a conversation about something of which only she has the most knowledge as he says he never did such a thing to anyone, including her.


52 posted on 09/22/2018 12:07:36 PM PDT by This I Wonder32460 (You can lead a horse to water but you can't make the horse drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu

I don’t think she’s being special treatment because she’s a woman. I think she’s asking for special treatment...because she’s a Democrat.


53 posted on 09/22/2018 4:51:09 PM PDT by Melian (Patriots fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu

Do you think she is asking for extra special handling because she is a woman? No

Do you think she is being treated differently because she is a woman? No

For both questions this is happening because she’s a liberal going after a conservative.

I don’t believe her. She’s a sociopath working with a group of sociopaths.


54 posted on 09/22/2018 5:03:41 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

“She’s a sociopath working with a group of sociopaths.”

AKA the Democrat


55 posted on 09/22/2018 5:04:48 PM PDT by combat_boots (God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! Merry Christmas! In God We Trust!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: blu
Do you think she is asking for extra special handling because she is a woman?

Yes

Do you think she is being treated differently because she is a woman?

Yes, but not for the reason most people think.

If teenage inappropriate contact can be redefined in the public's eye as the same as rape or attempted rape (and the MSM has been doing their best to push the narrative), then the Commies can next trot out Summer Zervos, who has a lawsuit against Trump claiming he inappropriately hugged her when she went to his hotel room for a ham sandwich, and go after Trump for redefined "attempted rape". Ford is not the end-game. She's just one more opening salvo in a treasonous game to destroy all America stands for.

56 posted on 09/22/2018 5:37:21 PM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu

Do I think Ford is being treated differently because she is a woman? No, Ford is being treated differently because she is a Democrat.

I have actually read her year book comments where there were wild drinking parties until one passed out and woke up and couldn’t remember what happened as well as Ford’s admittance of having been with over 52 men from 11th grade up until she started college. This was said in her own words.

I personally do not believe her and I think DiFi doesn’t believe her either and that is why she held on to the letter for so long.


57 posted on 09/22/2018 8:35:15 PM PDT by TRAPPER2 ( God Bless Our Troops and God Bless America!! In God We Trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu

Do you think she is asking for extra special handling because she is a woman?

YES

Do you think she is being treated differently because she is a woman?

YES

You can say if you believe her or not, but the real questions are above.

PLUS SHE’S LYING


58 posted on 09/22/2018 9:34:35 PM PDT by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson