Posted on 09/13/2018 9:16:12 PM PDT by ransomnote
Up yours. Unlike you, I have a life. I don’t have the time or the inclination to constantly kick crap out of my way to get to the other side of the Q yard. These threads are turning into the sidewalks of San Francisco - blighted with the urine and excrement of the great unwashed. It’s a thread killer. But, that’s really the whole point, isn’t it?
WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley issued the following statement regarding the nomination of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.
“Anyone who comes forward as Dr. Ford has deserves to be heard, so I will continue working on a way to hear her out in an appropriate, precedented and respectful manner.
“The standard procedure for updates to any nominee’s background investigation file is to conduct separate follow-up calls with relevant parties. In this case, that would entail phone calls with at least Judge Kavanaugh and Dr. Ford. Consistent with that practice, I asked Senator Feinstein’s office yesterday to join me in scheduling these follow-ups. Thus far, they have refused. But as a necessary step in evaluating these claims, I’ll continue working to set them up.
“Unfortunately, committee Republicans have only known this person’s identity from news reports for less than 24 hours and known about her allegations for less than a week. Senator Feinstein, on the other hand, has had this information for many weeks and deprived her colleagues of the information necessary to do our jobs. The Minority withheld even the anonymous allegations for six weeks, only to later decide that they were serious enough to investigate on the eve of the committee vote, after the vetting process had been completed.
“It’s deeply disturbing that the existence of these allegations were leaked in a way that seemed to preclude Dr. Ford’s confidentiality.
“Over my nearly four decades in the Senate I have worked diligently to protect whistleblowers and get to the bottom of any issue. Dr. Ford’s attorney could have approached my office, while keeping her client confidential and anonymous, so that these allegations could be thoroughly investigated. Nevertheless, we are working diligently to get to the bottom of these claims.”
Is this your opus or just your narcissistic slide?
And, up my what? We must speak in complete sentences here.
Oh my goodness!!!
Wonder why?????
::Aha! So he admits to knowing her!::
From her reputed history, it sounds like every guy in the school knew her!
TEXOKIE-I agree that Zeifman’s story about “missing files” is probably only partly true.
IMHO the ENTIRE Watergate brouhaha was about the JEH files.
Hoover, for decades, understood “how’ to use those files to “maximum effect” without destroying the system
All of Washington was desperate to determine the disposition of those files. Here is a link discussing this in the NYT
For the Clinton’s, JEH files, would have been their ticket-both “opening doors” and providing “life insurance” via a deadmans drop.
No other individual or couple in all of US History-not even from the Bush Dynasty-which itself precedes WWII-going back to Prescott Bush-has wielded so much power for so long.
Their propagation of appropriated power is assured into the future, past their own demise, unless the CF/CGI are totally taken down
Heck for all intent and purpose it looks as though HRC STILL may be running the DOJ!!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Thanks for that article link. Very interesting stuff. I continue to think that your scenario is plausible - but this seems to be one of those things that is very difficult to track and prove. Great job on explaining some disparate data points!
Q
Gotcha! 💻 I got algorithms, I got music, who could ask for anything more?! tee hee
.
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3688128/posts?page=1
Christine Ford is willing to testify publicly before the Senate Judiciary Committee
Twitter ^ | 9/17/2018 | Peter Alexander
Good 'book report'! I recorded it and watched it Sunday eve... I agree: I have to start watching / recording Maria's 'Sunday Morning Futures'... I keep hearing pithy news all week from there, decided to take a look see. Most of Sunday Morning is weak coffee. ☕️
I have wondered why she left CNBC; perhaps so that she can do real news! Tip-o-hat
Flake will borrow McNoName’s famous (now dead) thumbs, ceremoniously and pompously point them downward, and stick it to Trump.
Here’s why -Collins didn’t bite and accuser history is collapsing.
http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/17/susan-collins-kavanaugh-allegation/
Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine questioned on Sunday why Democrats waited until after the Senate Judiciary Hearing to introduce the allegations of sexual assault against Judge Brett Kavanaugh.
“What is puzzling to me is the Democrats, by not bringing this out earlier, after having had this information for more than six weeks, have managed to cast a cloud of doubt on both the professor and the judge,” Collins told The New York Times. “If they believe Professor Ford, why didn’t they surface this information earlier so that he could be questioned about it?”
“OMG, check the comments!!”
I read the Comments before the articles. :-O
Ford is the first women I’ve seen that uses the Senate Judiciary Committee to stalk an old high school sweetheart rather than FaceBook.
In the best Hillary voice: "Was it a horny little freshman girl or a junior boy out for a good time that evening?!?! What difference, at this point, does it make???"
Don’t give anything she says credence as being possible. I don’t believe a word of it, including whether she was ever at a party with Kavanaugh.
Another poster somewhere said she was called “Blowsy” in high school, and there were incidents with her and multiple football players at a time. Her school was a sister school of a different school than Georgetown Prep. The entire thing is made up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.