I think it could be easily proven that Google, Facebook and Twitter are politically motivated in their censorship decisions, and therefore, to the extent they favor Democrats, they ARE a partisan organization, and are giving billions of dollars of campaign donations every election. MSM is a little trickier; they are not internet service providers open to the general public, they are news organizations. Probably couldn’t regulate content on the NYT any more than you could on FR or Breitbart.
:: they ARE a partisan organization, and are giving billions of dollars of campaign donations every election. ::
And, they STILL don’t realize that Donaldus Magnus, in a brilliant jiu-jitsu move, used the media for free advertising in the 2016 campaign. Every time they would try to trip him up, he would get FRE face time to explain his position. It wasn’t paid for...the media made it THE NEWS.
Bagster’s gung-fu must bow with a covered fist to the Trump jiu-jitsu.
What about presenting lies, that they know are lies, as “news”?
And then there’s the leaks/CLAS stuff they posted as articles. That there will bring a lot of punishment sooner or later.
If we do not find a way to Constitutionally control their activities they may succeed in their mission of destroying our Republic. To my mind, the Constitutional way is for all conservatives to abandon those media and someone start a fairer social platform [competition]... expensive, I am sure, but there are those with the resources. If our social media is as one-sided as our opponents then let both sides be dealt with in the same fashion.
Thus spake Simplethustra! ⚖️