[Okeydoker]

What it looks like is that fewer FReepers are fallng for the Q nonsense. Only 80 posts when there used to be 500? People are obviously seeing that none of the q BS has come to pass. Nor will it. Even twitter is hyping the ongoing exposure of the handful of dirtbags that created Q to make money.

But dont let facts get in the way of your anonymous religion.

And by the way, civilians tried in military courts is unlawful and unconstitutional. I know the q frauds arent lawyers but even some of your midnight research should have discovered that even a president cant waive the constitution.

[xone]

civilians tried in military courts is unlawful and unconstitutional.

Idiot, read Law of Armed Conflict. Think the Talibunnies weren't civilians?

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: it looks like is that fewer FReepers are fallng for the Q nonsense ::

Yet...HERE you are.

[corlorde]

Q believers are so excited about their claim that top Dems will be imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay that they made a website for it:

http://gitmotrials.com/

[Defiant]

Trolls gotta troll. It’s what they do.

Now piss off.

[Hostage]

LET'S GET THOSE Q MOFOS, KAY? WHADYA SAY? WHADYA SAY?

[Typelouder]

What it looks like is that fewer FReepers are fallng for the Q nonsense. Only 80 posts when there used to be 500? People are obviously seeing that none of the q BS has come to pass. Nor will it.

I'm still here. I cannot devote the time to the threads like I did a couple weeks ago, but I'm trusting the plan.

[Enigo54]

SRILL waiting for you in the “infinity” channel to beat your chest like a man!

[philman_36]

And by the way, civilians tried in military courts is unlawful and unconstitutional.

Sec. 904 - Art. 104. Aiding the enemy
10 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2011 Edition
Title 10 - ARMED FORCES
Subtitle A - General Military Law
PART II - PERSONNEL
CHAPTER 47 - UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE
SUBCHAPTER X - PUNITIVE ARTICLES
Sec. 904 - Art. 104. Aiding the enemy
From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov

§904. Art. 104. Aiding the enemy

Any person who—

(1) aids, or attempts to aid, the enemy with arms, ammunition, supplies, money, or other things; or

(2) without proper authority, knowingly harbors or protects or gives intelligence to, or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly;

shall suffer death or such other punishment as a court-martial or military commission may direct. This section does not apply to a military commission established under chapter 47A of this title.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 70; Pub. L. 109–366, §4(a)(2), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2631.)

"Any person" pretty much covers everybody, civilian and military, doesn't it?

[reed13k]

You are not 100% correct, I posted this a few days ago:

From this link: https://www.lawfareblog.com/military-jurisdiction-over-civilians-why-supreme-court-should-grant-cert-ali

“Prior to 2006, the UCMJ had authorized military trials for civilians “serving with or accompanying an armed force in the field,” but only during “time of war.””

“In 2006, Congress expanded that authorization to also allow such trials during a “contingency operation,” which federal law defines as virtually any overseas deployment (and some domestic ones) where troops are or may become involved in operations against an “enemy of the United States or against an opposing military force.””

That article also gives examples of civilian contractors tried since the change in 2006 and notes that there is a limitation for this on host country nationals that is in place through the MEJA

Finally only military courts have express authority over military crimes. What I have found is that this includes mutiny and sedition; but not treason or espionage.

The only questions for me then would be:
a) Do the crimes in question fall under the sedition exclusivity for military courts? Sedition for me means: overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that tends toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent towards, or resistance against established authority. The subversion of the constitution piece would be the main focus of concern here. Typically the military uses this charge for disruption of good order and discipline, but it is a rare charge. Usually “failure to follow/obey lawful orders” gets the most usage.

b) Could the individuals as part of taking their oaths or holding certain positions have agreed to fall under the UCMJ for certain aspects of their duties or certain charges? I could see where the Secretaries of defense, army, navy, etc and the President would be in the chain of command and subject to the UCMJ - I just don’t know if that is formalized. What about the rest of the cabinet? Not sure.

c) Did any of the acts occur “In Theater” or within an operational zone?

I would instead see illegal contact with a foreign national as violations of espionage, treason, and/or the Logan Act. All can be tried in civilian courts and cover the acts you noted. Again for me the question is did they rise to subversion of the Constitution and the definition of Sedition. In that case it could be taken into military courts as I understand.

For any of those better versed in the legal parsing - please chime in.

[edzo4]

perhaps they are just lying?

which I don’t understand
especially about stuff that anyone can go confirm for themselves,

Q Anon: 08/17/18 “Trust The Plan” 1628
Q Anon: 08/11/18 “Trust The Plan” 1814
Q Anon: 08/8/18 “Trust The Plan” 2226
Q Anon: 08/05/18 “Trust The Plan” 1300
Q Anon: 08/01/18 “Trust The Plan” 1977
Q Anon: 07/29/18 “Trust The Plan” 2391
Q Anon: 07/25/18 “Trust The Plan” 2005
Q Anon: 07/22/18 “Trust The Plan” 1839
Q Anon: 07/21/18 “Trust The Plan” 934
Q Anon: 07/17/18 “Trust The Plan” 1674
Q Anon: 07/14/18 “Trust The Plan” 1579
Q Anon: 07/11/18 “Trust The Plan” 1151
Q Anon: 07/07/18 “Trust The Plan” 1800
Q Anon: 07/03/18 “Trust The Plan” 1909
Q Anon: 6/27/18 FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops 1805
Q Anon: 6/24/18 FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops 1952
Q Anon: 6/20/18 FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops 1474
Q Anon: 6/17/18 FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops 1792
Q Anon: 6/15/18 FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops 1246
Q Anon: FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops 1713
Q Anon: FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops 1171
Q Anon: FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops 1764
Q Anon: (6/9/18) FRiendly FReeper Collaboration 1062
Q Anon: (6/6/18) FRiendly FReeper Collaboration 953
Q Anon: (6/3/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1496
Q Anon: (6/1/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 903
Q Anon: (5/28/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1116
Q Anon: (5/24/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1375
Q Anon: (5/21/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1453
Q Anon: (5/19/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1852
Q Anon: (5/17/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2197
Q Anon: (5/15/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2540
Q Anon: (5/12/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2676
Q Anon: (5/11/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1615
Q Anon: (5/8/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2710
Q Anon: (5/6/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1708
Q Anon: (5/4/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1491
Who is #Qanon? (really interesting 19:30 video) 2067
Q Anon: (5/2/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2088
Q Anon: (4/30/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1699
Q Anon: (4/28/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2013
Q Anon: (4/26/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2091
Q Anon: (4/24/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2437
Q Anon: (4/22/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2492
Q Anon: (4/20/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2891
Q Anon: (4/18/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2573
Q Anon: (4/16/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1878
Q Anon: (4/14/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1998
Q Anon: (4/12/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2018
Q Anon: (4/10/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2188
Q Anon: (4/8/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2367
Q Anon: (4/6/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 3149
Q Anon: (4/4/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 3045
Q Anon: (4/2/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2972
Q Anon: (3/30/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1669
Q Anon: (3/28/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1882
Q Anon: (3/24/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2382
Q Anon: (3/22/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2286
Q Anon: (3/20/18) Continued from Sunday’s thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1669
Q Anon: (3/18/18) Continued from Friday’s thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1245
Q Anon: (3/16/18) Continued from Tuesday’s thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2049
Q Anon: (3/13/18) Continued from Monday’s thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1950
Q Anon: (3/12/18) Continued from Friday’s thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1189
Q Anon: (3/9/18) Continued from Wednesday’s thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 2647
Q Anon: (3/7/18) Continued from Monday’s thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1741
Q Anon: (3/5/18) Continued from Friday’s thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1394
Q Anon: (3/2/18) Continued from Wednesday’s thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration 1321

[Conservative Gato]

What it looks like is that fewer FReepers are fallng for the Q nonsense. Only 80 posts when there used to be 500? People are obviously seeing that none of the q BS has come to pass. Nor will it. Even twitter is hyping the ongoing exposure of the handful of dirtbags that created Q to make money.

But don't let facts get in the way of your anonymous religion.

And by the way, civilians tried in military courts is unlawful and unconstitutional. I know the q frauds arent lawyers but even some of your midnight research should have discovered that even a president cant waive the constitution.

I apologize in advance for this little disruption. I'm way behind on this thread as we've already hit 500+ posts and this troll posts an extremely foolish claim. Oh well, those who scream the loudest...

I guess it was wishful thinking on this trolls part thinking The Great Awakening is slowing down (bolded quote for full effect). If anything, I see a bunch more new posters to these threads bringing their thoughts and research which is great! Keep it coming! I'll get caught up eventually. I also see more Americans involved with Q on social medias and comment sections so this is also a good thing.

With the current discussions leading to the exposure/justice of the pedo/child trafficking rings or worse, why would anyone in their right mind "wishfully" think this good movement is receding???

CGato

[edzo4]

Only 80 posts when there used to be 500?

You were saying???? LOL