Thanks for the summary news report generally.
Wouldn't someone who owns one share of Fakebook/Twatter/Gootube have standing to sue, based on the notion that their censorship of conservatives represents malfeasance, and a breach of their fiduciary responsibility to maximize shareholder equity, because their activities are driving away conservatives and reducing revenue?
That could immediately be expanded to a class action, with the class being all shareholders.
You would think that some money grubbing ambulance chaser would be slobbering at the chance for a payout like that.
Just this once, I must break my self-imposed guideline to 'quibble not' over your butchering of the sacred 'Firefly' quotables...
You SHOULD have written "you can't stop the signal MAL." Who is Mel? Didn't he own a diner or sumtin???
#bagsterlovesnonhomologic
#bagsterisafireflynoob
:-)