Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: No_Doll_i; ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; generally; Wneighbor; mairdie; ...

Oh dear, rumor has it that POTUS just signed a bill that will yank security clearances for SES peeps. Waiting for sauce, sounds promising.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

That could be on the boomage list!


905 posted on 08/13/2018 4:39:10 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 853 | View Replies ]


To: TEXOKIE

You mean an Executive Order?


907 posted on 08/13/2018 4:41:47 PM PDT by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 905 | View Replies ]

To: TEXOKIE; No_Doll_i
Oh dear, rumor has it that POTUS just signed a bill that will yank security clearances for SES peeps.

I have never understood the entire anon issue with SES. Senior Executive Service (SES) is a legitimate rank for very senior civilians. There are also rank structures within SES, depending on the position of authority.

Cabinet Secretaries are another matter. Would people care to know that President Trump's chief of staff, Gen (ret) Kelly holds SES rank?

President Trump has other SES ranked individuals working directly for him. I worked for SES executives in the Pentagon, one who was a retired full Colonel, fighter pilot, and Purple Heart recipient.

Perhaps people are not understanding the term.

Are there Obama holdovers at that rank. Sure.

Are there Trump people at that rank? Absolutely.

Trump would not yank clearances for "SES peeps", but perhaps for certain individuals. But even then, I don't see how that would work. You either fire them, or you do not. They can't continue in their job without the security clearance.

People who leave government service, like the snake Brennan, still retain clearances - and Q spoke about this, and the connection to 5 Eyes to cover up any record of access to classified information.

913 posted on 08/13/2018 4:53:38 PM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 905 | View Replies ]

To: TEXOKIE

Having one’s security clearance revoked is grounds for dismissal if one’s job or position requires a security clearance. BOOOOM!


950 posted on 08/13/2018 5:40:20 PM PDT by Billyv ( Ephesians 6:11 for we battle not against flesh and blood...Pray for our leaders and nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 905 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson