Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA signs off on SpaceX’s “load-and-go” procedure for crew launches
Spaceflight Now ^ | August 9, 2018 | Stephen Clark

Posted on 08/09/2018 9:09:56 AM PDT by BenLurkin

The NASA manager overseeing development of Boeing and SpaceX’s commercial crew ferry ships says the space agency has approved SpaceX’s proposal to strap in astronauts atop Falcon 9 rockets, then fuel the launchers in the final hour of the countdown as the company does for its uncrewed missions.

The “load-and-go” procedure has become standard for SpaceX’s satellite launches, in which an automatic countdown sequencer commands chilled kerosene and cryogenic liquid oxygen to flow into the Falcon 9 rocket in the final minutes before liftoff.

“From a program standpoint, we went throgh a pretty extensive process where we laid out the different options for loading the crew, and assessing how the vehicles have been designed, and what the trades were,” said Kathy Lueders, NASA’s commercial crew program manager, in an interview Friday. “That came to the program in June, and after looking at it, we felt like the current baseline plan for how SpaceX plans to load the crews meets our requirements.”

Other liquid-fueled rockets, such as United Launch Alliance’s Atlas 5 launcher, typically receive their propellants earlier in their countdowns. The Atlas 5, which will be used to launch Boeing’s CST-100 Starliner capsule, consumes the same propellants as the Falcon 9.

(Excerpt) Read more at spaceflightnow.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: aerospace; atlas5; boeing; cst100; elonmusk; falcon9; falconheavy; kathylueders; loadandgo; nasa; space; spaceforce; spacex; starliner; trumpdod; trumpnssa; ula
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: TalonDJ
Here are a couple for you:

"And that explosion proves they did not weight that risk high enough or do their do diligence in making the design robust the first time."

What could possibly go wrong?

21 posted on 08/09/2018 11:26:26 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

LOL, I know. It is considered shorthand for obvious “unforseen effects” of things, usually from Leftists.

You know, they have an infestation of some kind of bug, so they bring in some other bug that is known to eat that bug, and the bug they bring in generates bigger problems and the whole ecological system falls apart.

Who could have ever seen that coming? Well...EVERYBODY with half a brain?

My brother and I both work in IT, and we humorously use the expression with each other as our finger hovers over the enter key, knowing full well what could possibly go wrong!


22 posted on 08/09/2018 12:07:41 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“load-and-go” for “spam in a can”


23 posted on 08/09/2018 3:32:42 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Thanks fieldmarshaldj. Musk hasn't made any recent claims of first manned flights in 2018, but I think they may be about to surprise all our asses.



24 posted on 08/09/2018 10:26:43 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Gus, who died during a ground test, inside a building, in an all-oxygen breathing mixture conflagration in a not-ready-for-primetime Apollo capsule with exposed wiring? Is that the Gus Grissom you mean?

25 posted on 08/09/2018 10:38:33 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
It's no riskier either way. Either load first, with all the fuel right there when the crew boards, or board the crew, then fill 'er up.

26 posted on 08/09/2018 10:39:29 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

They were in a simulation of the Apollo stack, my error. No fuel involved, though, period. The fire led to use of a standard atmospheric mix in Apollo spacecraft. The Russian cosmonauts who died during reentry were believed to have died as a consequence of their 100% oxygen cabin, if memory serves.

https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/apollo1info.html


27 posted on 08/09/2018 10:43:45 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

SpaceX is still working on a new, safer helium tank design needed for launches with astronauts, and the debut of the company's upgraded Falcon 9 Block 5 rocket earlier this month did not count as one of seven successful missions in "crew configuration" NASA says it requires before putting astronauts aboard the vehicle, officials said Thursday... NASA says SpaceX needs to introduce that change to the Falcon 9 rocket before it starts counting the seven successful launches before a mission with astronauts. The new helium bottles are known as composite overwrapped pressure vessels, or COPVs, and they store cold helium at high pressures for injection into the rocket's propellant tanks, maintaining their pressure as the Falcon 9's engines consume kerosene and liquid oxygen in flight... NASA and SpaceX confirmed Thursday that the modified COPVs were not on the May 11 launch, but will instead be flown for the first time on a test mission of the company's Crew Dragon capsule called Demo-1, currently set for liftoff at the end of August without any astronauts on-board... "In aerospace, 'testing like we fly' is a long standing tenet for safe operations and understanding of critical systems," said Cheryl Warner, a NASA spokesperson, in response to an inquiry from Spaceflight Now. "We anticipate this configuration will be ready for Demonstration Mission 1... NASA officials have been cautious in their assessments of Boeing and SpaceX schedules, saying further delays in both vehicles are likely, with the first crew test flights potentially slipping into 2019... NASA is still considering the final-hour fueling plan proposed by SpaceX, known as "load-and-go," but agency managers are expected to decide soon whether to approve it.

New helium tank for SpaceX crew launches still waiting to fly | Stephen Clark | May 25, 2018

28 posted on 08/09/2018 11:06:35 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

An anomaly during the most recent test of the Starliner, Boeing's planned space taxi, means the company's aggressive timeline to replace NASA's space shuttle may have to be pushed back. NASA ... wanted to turn a June Starliner test flight into a full-fledged mission. It was a bold move that some scientists worried could jeopardize crew safety. Too bold, perhaps. "The engines successfully ignited and ran for the full duration," Boeing said in a statement. "During engine shutdown an anomaly occurred that resulted in a propellant leak." While Boeing didn't provide further details about what exactly went wrong, sources claimed that a valve in the propulsion system did not close entirely at the conclusion of the test, according to Ars Technica, which led to the leak... It remains to be seen whether this issue will affect Starliner's development schedule. Updates on crew test schedules should be released by NASA in the coming days. Both SpaceX and Boeing's launch dates are expected to be sometime in late 2019, and likely won't be able to win certification to send astronauts to the ISS until late 2019 at the earliest. The development is a blow to Boeing, which proposed an updated and accelerated schedule in a contract modification. The amendment would add a third blue-suited crew member to the Starliner "Crew Flight Test" and extend the mission from two weeks to a full six months, according to Florida Today.

Boeing suffers setback in space taxi testing | Lulu Chang and Mark Austin | July 22, 2018

29 posted on 08/10/2018 8:50:15 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ
Too bad no one here bothered to post the overlay of the pad abort test showing what would actually happen in that scenario. By the time they start loading fuel, they'll already be strapped in and the abort system will be armed. The pad support crews will already be away from the pad.



And oh yeah, unlike the Boeing Starliner abort system, this one actually works as designed.
30 posted on 08/20/2018 7:09:39 AM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: messierhunter

Yeah I mentioned that in post 19. I also pointed out that “but the people survived the explosion” does not make a launch into a success.

“And oh yeah, unlike the Boeing Starliner abort system, this one actually works as designed.”

Well if you read the details on the Starliner’s abort engine failure you will see that it did ignite and run the full duration. So it would have saved the crew. And it was an engine test not a full up abort system test. Finding issues is why they do tests. The SpaceX rocket that blew up was not a test. It was fully operational mission. Thank goodness the defect showed itself before they put a crew on one.


31 posted on 08/21/2018 3:57:10 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

Load and go or not would make no difference as to whether the launch is a success. If anything, load and go with deep cryogenic propellant offers additional margins in case of vehicle under-performance for other reasons. Boeing’s abort failure is requiring them to go back and redesign the system to prevent another such failure. Sure, failing to close valves after the full duration burn isn’t as bad as failing to open them... but could the root cause have potentially lead to a failure to open on another attempt? I can’t say, but it doesn’t sound good. Thankfully, SpaceX has a proven pad abort system available should the AMOS problem occur, and their initial testing of the hover capabilities of the super dracos gives them additional operational experience with those engines.


32 posted on 08/29/2018 6:44:45 AM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson