[EasySt]

That’s just about perfect, Generally!

Everyone knows I’ve bounced around that map a bit.

At the moment I’m sad because I got no “feels” from anyone for my observation (prompted by SkyPilot) that not only has our President chosen not to call out Q as false...

but also that Obama dare not do so.

So’ I’ma gonna mope back over to lurk moar at 8ch to improve my mood.

Be back l8r, FReeqs!

[txhurl]

.....he said ‘improves’, didn’t he.... oh that’s right, sustainable t*tt*es....

[generally]

Ok, here’s some feelz for ya!

I thing your theory about no comment from POTUS and no comment from 0vomit makes a LOT of sense!

Re: feelz. If I don’t object to a post I probably agree with it. or at minimum I don’t find it harmful to our cause (swamp draining). When a newbie posts, if no one else has said something welcoming, I try to. If lots of other posters have commented on a post, I try not to unless I think I have something new to add. I am VERY TEMPTED to comment on many more posts than I do, but I restrain myself!

To all: Anyone who wants feedback, PM me and I’ll give it! I have no shortage of opinions! I’m betting many other frequent FReeQs feel the same. And yeah, I am sometimes bummed when I think I’ve posted something important or insightful and it gets no comments! :-) We all have egos.

[bagster]

I got no “feels” from anyone for my observation (prompted by SkyPilot) that not only has our President chosen not to call out Q as false...

Dude.

I FEEL YA!!!!

I just don't respond to those type of posts, as they are directed to the skeptics and they go without saying to me. Preaching to the choir, and all that rot.

Sorry, bruh.

I'm sure I'm not the only one here who agrees with you. I'm under the impression that MOST people that post onthis thread completely believe that Q is what he says he is and trust the plan implicitly.

Yea, we have all different shades of opinion and "faith" (if I can use that word without triggering the trolls) in Q and the plan, as witnessed by the current controversy.

Maybe I'm beyond Q proofs for myself. But I still love them as things to be shoved in the face of the doubters so I can watch them dance and struggle to debunk them as if they don't all stand on a foundation of proof.

The Q skeptics behave like the cultists that they accuse us of being. They are the ones opining based on exactly zero evidence. They rely on feelings and emotion to make their arguments.

Anyway. Come back soon with tales from Chan-land and any juicy goss you come across.

Bagster