[bagster]

I got no “feels” from anyone for my observation (prompted by SkyPilot) that not only has our President chosen not to call out Q as false...

Dude.

I FEEL YA!!!!

I just don't respond to those type of posts, as they are directed to the skeptics and they go without saying to me. Preaching to the choir, and all that rot.

Sorry, bruh.

I'm sure I'm not the only one here who agrees with you. I'm under the impression that MOST people that post onthis thread completely believe that Q is what he says he is and trust the plan implicitly.

Yea, we have all different shades of opinion and "faith" (if I can use that word without triggering the trolls) in Q and the plan, as witnessed by the current controversy.

Maybe I'm beyond Q proofs for myself. But I still love them as things to be shoved in the face of the doubters so I can watch them dance and struggle to debunk them as if they don't all stand on a foundation of proof.

The Q skeptics behave like the cultists that they accuse us of being. They are the ones opining based on exactly zero evidence. They rely on feelings and emotion to make their arguments.

Anyway. Come back soon with tales from Chan-land and any juicy goss you come across.

Bagster

[EasySt]

Thanks bags.

I was really just making sure I wasn’t shadowbanned from everyone here except SkyPilot...

‘cause I pinged you guys with that new dimension extension of the “Could stop it with a tweet” Obummer included, development to add to your Red Pill arsenals.

I was starting to wonder if I really HAD missed the Osurper calling Q’s bluff.

My sanity level, whatever it is,

is what it is.

;-)

[AndyJackson]

I just don't respond to those type of posts, as they are directed to the skeptics and they go without saying to me.

Bags, be honest. You don’t respond because you are under caution after biting one too many trolls. One!? Well, a few. But to your credit , it’s tough work and someone had to do it.