Posted on 08/05/2018 10:45:44 AM PDT by ransomnote
He could be a witness to some CF or other stuff that Sessions needs to keep ALIVE... only way is home confinement w/security.
I guess he chose "or else"?
(The origin of "refused the call").
Any excuse to post one of my favorite scenes.
Bagster
No worries, I only knew about because I was researching github a while back and saw the transaction information.
"In addition to #Qanon posts, this site allows you to create your own side-by-side proof graphics."
ransomnote: It's really easy (for me) to forget the ".org" and use ".com" by mistake and I was really confused to look around the wrong site.
The site has interesting options but will take a little investigation to see how the "create side by side" meme feature works. Looks like it has good Q resources.
https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/cyber-hijack-findings.html
lol, ..”Patches” Kennedy...
The strangest thing just happened, edzo.
Nevermind, edzo.
All systems are go.
#GhostInTheMachine
#AndGoodnight
#BattleWellFought
Bagster
Good point... I was just generalizing people's various frustrations... I didn't clarify very well [I am just a doddering elderly slobberer... ;^)]
Hee hee Good shot! These people are from a different universe... where does one start an intelligent conversation? 😏
Are any helperanons at 8ch dropping hints about what might happen today?
Agreed! I don’t go to his site because of the pop ups.
All right, girl. Im posting blind to you. Still in the early Laurel Canyon digs of yours.
My advice? Stay focused FReeQ! Remember, youre not supposed to keep pouring four-fingered drinks of knowledge to the Qanteen. Not after the first four or five rounds. At least. :)
Seriously, you are writing a book (very interesting one), but slow down a bit for us otherwise many will scroll past due to lack of time.
Myself? Ive been digging the past couple days on Fiona Barnett, who shares very similar stories to Cathy OBrian, which is reflected in Twitter star Sarah Ruth Ashcraft, and has now been echoed by an actor named Isaak Kappy (who I never heard of until he went public with serious accusations). [run on sentence award? anyone?]
((You)) sent me down several side passages on my spelunQing. (the parens are a Chan-thing). Now, suitably distracted, I need to push away my loved ones in the Qanteen to give me a quiet corner to peruse the new tunnels. Lantern in hand, rugged shoes, denim pants, and a casually slung sidearm on the hip. And rope.
Hugs. And ChillaQs. Ill be with you all soon.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Posting blind back!
I thank you for the advice and encouragement. Truly not trying to write a book!
There is so much THERE there!....and I wasn’t sure when ransomnote would change the thread!
I am so looking forward to your own report on Barnett.
I hope the side passages were not unfruitful. Not sure what I did to send you there, but I hope it was worthwhile!
*texokie prepares a nice corner for KitJ in the meeting room down the hall from the Oracle and LexiQon offices to spread out all materials from his dig on the large table in there once he gets back from spelunking. It has a nice door, and people rarely go in there anyway*
Please, let me know if you want on or off my ping list!
I couldn’t manage moving around the net without
adblockplus
free
Good questionms.
Q said that Ryan was needed for certain things to happen:
Jul 26 2018 12:44:26 Q !CbboFOtcZs 2296993 https://1zwchz1jbsr61f1c4mgf0abl-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Gohmert_Mueller_UNMASKED.pdf What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject? Known beforehand? Optics. Think logically. Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma? What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]? Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts? Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly know if recused? Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from? Think logically. One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from. Who does Huber [directly] report to? Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC? Why is this important? Why did Sessions recuse? Is the LEFT attacking Sessions? What advantage(s) exist based on this setup? POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal? Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable? When POTUS states the swamp is being drained do you believe it? When POTUS states its happening do you believe it? Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasnt being done to his liking? LOGICAL THINKING. Clickbait derails logical thought. Think for yourself. Trust yourself. Mueller investigating POTUS Tweets for obstruction? You have a front row seat. Enjoy the show. Q
Look at this NY Times article. Is is VERY strange.
Ryan announced in April that he would not be seeking re-election, ending a 20-year run in Congress that, for most of it, seemed to be on a straight-up trajectory. Ryans official reason for leaving was that his family clock was ticking and he no longer wanted to be a weekend dad. But its easy to suspect otherwise, and not just because that is a clichéd excuse: Ambitious 48-year-old politicians at the peak of their powers dont suddenly just decide to quit because theyve discovered that their teenage children are growing up fast back in Wisconsin. Ryan should, by rights, be riding out of town at the pinnacle of his starlit Washington career. Yet he remains a distinctly awkward match to a moment and president that seem certain to define much of his legacy.
And then there is this:
Trump used to call Ryan Boy Scout. I thought it was a compliment, said Ryan, a former altar boy and habitual people-pleaser. But after the Republican-controlled Congress passed a few bills Trump announced to Ryan that he would stop using the nickname. So I guess he meant it as an insult all along, the speaker said. I didnt realize. Ryan shrugged.
There is a ton more in that article. We know Ryan is not leaving by his own volition.
It's obvious from the interview, however, that Ryan really, really hates Donald Trump.
I mentioned to Ryan that according to an online poll released that morning by Axios and SurveyMonkey, 79 percent of Republicans approved of Trumps news conference in Helsinki. Oh, really, Ryan said, looking startled for a second. It has to be deflating, on some level, to spend years fashioning yourself as one of the Republican Partys thought leaders, only to see your position routed by a troll with a killer Twitter following. I thought it was a really bad press conference, Ryan said. He said again that Trump just loves to troll you guys. I asked him if he derived any enjoyment from watching you guys being so expertly trolled. Not really, Ryan said. I dont think like that, and I dont act like that, he said. Trump just wants to see your heads explode, and he just wants you to spend the next 12 hours talking about this.
Great point.
Any guesses how long such a blackout might last.
Slightly related: I admit to being a total sucker for expecting BIG things to happen any second now. Every time Q posts something BIG is about to drop. Every time Q posts something ominous. Every time Trump dose something unusual. I thought it was going to happen when Melania wis in the hospital, when Trump was in Singapore, after he pointed to Q at the rally, and now when he is on vacation.
Eventually, I’m going to be right! Sigh.
My current thinking is that BIG things will happen before the school year begins. So soon.
Could be.
But even if it was related to the Clinton Foundation, I guarantee you that right now, members of Congress are in absolute shock that one of their own (and a Republican to boot) was arrested and indicted for Insider Trading by the Trump Depart Of Justice.
Almost ALL of them are guilty of this crime.
See this article:
Congress Cashes in on Insider Trading
In 2011, a CBS investigation blew the lid off of one of Washingtons most poorly-kept secrets: members of Congress were routinely exploiting legal loopholes to engage in insider trading and line their own pockets a criminal offense for regular citizens. In the ensuing public outrage, Congress passed a law called the STOCK Act, and took a loud victory lap for supposedly putting an end to their own unscrupulous behavior.
Now that they think nobodys watching, Congress has gutted a key disclosure provision of the STOCK Act. Worse still, the House Counsels Office, led by Speaker John Boehners handpicked lawyer, is actively stonewalling the first ever investigation into Congressional insider trading by claiming immunity from the very law they bragged about passing just a few years earlier.
Now ask yourself this question in the context of the previous NY Times article I posted:
How did Q+ and the President convince Ryan, and SO MANY other members of Congress to not seek re-election this year?
I can think of several possibilities:
1. He’s super dirty and the insider trading is the LEAST of his crimes. But it’s the public one that he’s allowed to use to cover up the rest.
2. It’s a warning to other dirty Rs that this will no longer be tolerated.
3. He’s being taken out because he’s not with the anti-Swamp program.
4. He’s being taken out in order to introduce evidence in his trial. (Q keeps mentioning things about “how do you introduce evidence”)
5. He’s a vulnerable R seat and needs to be removed now in order to make way for a more solid R on election day.
6. They all do insider trading, but perhaps there are agreed upon bounds and he exceeded them.
7. Maybe he backstabbed the wrong person.
Probably other possibilities as well. Those above are not all mutually exclusive.
I am nearly Q-less the past few days... many med appointments and other personal business... sorry. I think today was the next target for revelations - post all of the primary elections. Hang in there! :^)
Yeah, I looked around... not much focus on anything ATM, plus slide-o-rama...... was kinda expecting Q to be talkative. Qanon.pub’s site owner cited ‘excessive use of resources’..really? with maybe only a million reads per month? maybe Brock is hammering them into a near- DDOS. Maybe team is waiting for 5:25:25p edt to burst the dam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.