Posted on 08/05/2018 10:45:44 AM PDT by ransomnote
There are a few names on that document that may have some difficulty meeting any “High Ethical Standards”.
My sincere apologies to the thread. It wont happen again.
Oops, sorry Jocko, I meant that for the post above yours.
Oh, MY!!!
Let's see the deep state wiggle out of this one.
#ThatsOneWayToFreeAssange
#WeHaveTheServer[S]
Bagster
Love it. Wish there were a good place in town to find some.
Good stuff, needs spell check or proofreader.
No joke.
The Committee finds that the Intelligence Community met President Obama's tasking and that the ICA is a sound intelligence product. ...The ICA states that:
... In July 2015, Russian intelligence gained access to Democratic National Committee (DNC) networks and maintained that access until at least June 2016.
- The Committee found this judgment supported by intelligence and further supported by our own investigation. Separate from the ICA, the Committee has conducted interviews of key individuals who have provided additional insights into these incidents.
... The Committee believes the conclusions of the ICA are sound, and notes that collection and analysis subsequent to the ICA's publication continue to reinforce its assessments.
Is the proposed interview of Julian Assange directed at subject matter the Senate Committe has already reached a conclusion on? Most curious.
#OneLove
#Irie
#PassTheDuchyOnTheLeftHandSide
(okay, one too many).
Bagster
I figured that out. Thanks for saying so.
Dated Aug 1. Hmmmm,
Any Q-drops immediately ^before^ that time that had implication / reference to JA?
Any BOOMs around that time?
Server[S] references?
Any breads associated with those crumbs?
https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1027046313018486784
Something VERY funny is going on with Democrat turnout in these special elections.
In TN, Dem turnout was 43% of 2016. In OH, it was an INSANE 87%!!! Rep was an anemic 40%. This same BS happened in AL.
Something stinks.
https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1027181594031706112
We keep seeing this in race after race. In KS, Democrats turned out 36% of their 2016 totals. In OH-12, they turned out ALMOST 90%!
Seriously what the hell? NO ONE TURNS OUT 90% of their Presidential vote in a Special Election that is just gonna be done over in 3 months.
https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1027182102649950214
These turnout numbers by Democrats in these special elections are IMPOSSIBLE. If there was enough of a #BlueWave to generate 90% + numbers, you’d be seeing similar numbers in primary turnout - but Democrat primary turnout is just normal if not a little down.
Thanks, that was a nice way to say that which needed saying.
@qntmpktsAs a victim of success, GitHub suddenly terminated access for http://qanon.pub . Until access is restored, you can use any of the other sites and backups, such as http://qntmpkts.keybase.pub or http://qanonmap.bitbucket.io . #QAnon #QClearancePatriot #Q
I was seeing some discussion on Tweeeter this morning, concerning voter turnout in Ohio-12, where Troy Balderson squeaked by with a victory.
Specifically, it was stated that democrat voter turnout was 87%, which far exceeds even Presidential election turnout. Makes me wonder if some chicanery took place that might have pushed the Dem vote unusually high. Something like backroom ballot marking, or bused-in college students from nearby Ohio State posing as voters.
I hope someone was watching closely and has evidence if any wrong-doing took place. I’m hearing that Balderson was somewhat of a weak candidate, but that huge democrat turnout raises a flag or two.
Wow. Usually the DEMs turn out at 188%.
But yeah, at least we know the ceiling for number of DEM votes. If they get more than this in another election, there will be some explaining to do.
But Q said the mid-terms are safe! {rolls eyes}
Re Alex Jones.
Remember Q post #1341
Q reposts an anon post that says AJ is a traitor.
We need to be careful with the whole AJ/censorship thing.
My position is that I’m AGAINST censorship. But that does not mean that I’m pro-AJ. I agree with much of what he says, but IMO he mixes real conspiracy theories in with crazy stuff in an effort to discredit all of it.
A TYPICAL DS tactic is to get us to jump on board an issue that we agree with in order to suck us into something we didn’t foresee. Not sure where they’re going with this one.
Be careful and watch them like a hawk. Don’t get suckered into agreeing with something whose RESULTS you like but whose MEANS of getting them is unconstitutional or otherwise questionable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.