Q Anon: 07/25/18 "Trust The Plan"

qanon.pub ^ | 7/25/2018 | Freepers, vanity

[grey_whiskers]

Yer still a troll.

Lots of disruptors with very ...convenient 1998 signup dates.

[grey_whiskers]

Typical liberal tactic. Ignore the refutation of your central point, then sidestep to impugn the opponent (DARVO).

[EasySt]

Well...

They might think they could just buzz over to the UK and do that if the right people in the UK were co-conspirators, though, mightn’t they?

[little jeremiah]

I absolutely do not believe that list. No freaking way.

[edzo4]

Lol says the dude whose ‘proof’ is a blog

But here is a quote

“There’s a lot of speculation around here,” Tom Mills, the spokesman said

It doesn’t say they didn’t see it first hand does it?
Additionally do you have access to FAA or the ATC reports and communications?

No, you have no idea what was or wasn’t reported so again i’ll believe my own eyes over a random blogger

I notices you ignored the pictures @1599 of the space shuttle time lapse that looks exactly like the missile launch and the helicopter image that looks nothing like it.

I hope I didn’t interupt your other attempts at thread sliding regarding q’s tripcode

[Snowybear]

After watching Praying Medic’s video of 7/28, my own reading elsewhere and a gut check I firmly believe the venom towards Sessions and yes, Mueller and Rosenstein is nothing but Kabuki Theater. It is necessary optics because it keeps the deep state and the Dims believing that Mueller and RR are on their side. They are hinging on their every word, and it’s all a set up.

Q says to trust Trump. Q says to trust Sessions. Who does RR report to? Who does Huber report to? Who does Mueller report to?

As a friend of mine likes to say, simple.

[little jeremiah]

I am sure that list of clumps of vomit were given as part of a slightly longer list to pick from.

[edzo4]

You are correct

However I did not want to change the quote from how it was written in the article

And the distances and width of the field of view were the ‘focus’ of my point (camera humor)

[Snowybear]

One other thing after watching Praying Medic’s video; Assange needs to be pardoned here, brought here and given asylum vs. UK and Sweden. I’m watching for this news. When it happens it will be another step in the big reveal.

[Jack Black]

I'm not dancing. The word was first used in English in 1821. etomology of "Journalism"people writing for newspapers had not even come up with the concept. Mostly they were publisher/writers.

Sort of like dentists of the period.

[No_Doll_i]

Watch it dude or don’t check my date LoL

[bagster]

Carlson claims that Podesta has been given immunity in the D.C. case,

Again, not exactly true, Jack.

Tucker said that Podesta was OFFERED immunity by Mueller. And that statement hasn't been debunked, has it?

See for yourself.

Tucker Carlson two minute video.

Bagster

[Jack Black]

Your original post had no content other than personal attacks and a thinly veiled threat.

Put up or shut up. Happy to meet you in the ring, cuck. Name the place, bagster can referee.

[Snowybear]

It was debunked. I posted it in the last Q thread and of course I didn’t save the link. I’ll try better next time.

[bagster]

Hey wait a minute.

What exactly is your theory on that missile photo. Do you think it's fake? A light from a helicopter, which was one lame attempt at debunkery.

What exactly is your theory? I honestly want to know.

Keep in mind that the picture exists. What is your explanation for it? Or are you all about debunkery and nothing more.

Bagster

[Jack Black]

Yes, offered is the word he used, you are correct. "Given" and offered are slightly different. If he accepts it, then it was given.

I agree, completely, it has not been debunked, especially given Tucker's later clarification that it was the D.C. trial, not the Virginia one.

I'm really looking forward to the D.C. case getting to the point where Mueller has to disclose this.

[bagster]

yours, MrEverythingfag

You should make that your tagline, Jack.

That way you don't have to say it in every post. Saves time.

And it's so true. Is there anything you don't know?

Color me impressed.

Bagster

[grey_whiskers]

Put up or shut up.

Now *that* pisses me off. Not you, teh Internet. I had written a 10-15 minutes-to-compose post citing chapter and verse from the older Q 4chan drops, explaining how the board had been compromised temporarily, and how Q's first response had been not for being "right", but for OPSEC *only*. And how he resolved it.

I then cited Q drops describing the CIA supercomputers used to try to break Q's security (The Seven Dwarves, with the names).

I tied these together to show how Q was more concerned with security than through getting his messages out through *official* channels; and that you yourself were the one defining Q's legitimacy (or at least making a bid to do so) in terms of whether he would identify himself to known MSM affiliates of the Deep State.

Which, ya know, given Q's posts of the MSM being involved in Treason on an unheard-of scale, kinda makes your dogged implying, but still just-deniably-shy-of-*insisting*, that Q bare their identity to the press...dayyum suspicious.

Oh wait. The internet didn't eat that comment.

It was Post #1631 this thread.

[bagster]

innocent seekers of the truth,

You sleigh me, Jack.

I'll try the veal.

Bagster

[bagster]

And the distances and width of the field of view were the ‘focus’ of my point (camera humor)

I have some late night camera humor for ya, edzo.

These two bick black ladies go to K-mart to get in on the $1.00 portrait deal.

They're posing in front of the camera, when the camera dude says, "Hold on ladies, I gotta focus."

One of the black ladies says, "Focus?....

Bofus???"

*Remember to tip your waitress.*

Bagster