[Jack Black]

Your original post had no content other than personal attacks and a thinly veiled threat.

Put up or shut up. Happy to meet you in the ring, cuck. Name the place, bagster can referee.

[grey_whiskers]

Put up or shut up.

Now *that* pisses me off. Not you, teh Internet. I had written a 10-15 minutes-to-compose post citing chapter and verse from the older Q 4chan drops, explaining how the board had been compromised temporarily, and how Q's first response had been not for being "right", but for OPSEC *only*. And how he resolved it.

I then cited Q drops describing the CIA supercomputers used to try to break Q's security (The Seven Dwarves, with the names).

I tied these together to show how Q was more concerned with security than through getting his messages out through *official* channels; and that you yourself were the one defining Q's legitimacy (or at least making a bid to do so) in terms of whether he would identify himself to known MSM affiliates of the Deep State.

Which, ya know, given Q's posts of the MSM being involved in Treason on an unheard-of scale, kinda makes your dogged implying, but still just-deniably-shy-of-*insisting*, that Q bare their identity to the press...dayyum suspicious.

Oh wait. The internet didn't eat that comment.

It was Post #1631 this thread.

[bagster]

Happy to meet you in the ring, cuck.

Simmer down, Jack. He didn't even call you a soi-boi yet.

So touchy

Bagster