You edit very effectively.
I’ve been reading Q for many months - and ‘IT’ is also very effective.
Let’s make a deal: You keep trying to convince people that ‘following’ Q, and chasing it’s suggestions all over the Internet, is a good idea.
I’ll keep trying to tell them that it may NOT be such a great idea.
OK?
I did not "edit." I rebutted your claims. There's a difference.
I’ve been reading Q for many months - and ‘IT’ is also very effective.
I disagree. I see no evidence you've been "reading Q" at all. Your posts do not show any knowledge of what Q has actually stated or anything about the nature of the mostly Socratic Q format. Q poses questions, and does not order or direct followers to do or accept anything as you clhey aim.
You go on trying to convince people that "chasing" facts all over the Internet is not a good idea, especially when such searches result in facts that are germane to events of the past that have meaning and impact on events occurring now and the near future. THAT claim of yours is sheer insanity. FACTUAL KNOWLEDGE is always useful, especially knowledge one has discovered and confirmed with multiple sources, most not provided by anyone except one's own researches, on one's own.
Your position is the untenable one. That position is to "Please, Nothing to see here. Jut put your head back into the sand and ignore the facts." Really?