Posted on 07/14/2018 12:08:42 AM PDT by ransomnote
John Harwood is part of the media cabal.
To be fair, one of the posts clearly indicates further action AFTER the summit.
I’m not completely dependent on Q, but the movement, any movement, depends on momentum.
Q directs research, and as such allows those researching to more efficiently expend those limited resources.
I guess from that it follows that, for the moment, no more research is required and we wait for all the pennies to drop.
There is absolutely no reason Russia would not be competitive to China. Population profile is close to the same only, the poverty-stricken quotient is a bit akilter.
One good IKEA factory and !BAM!, off we go.
“”John Harwood is part of the media cabal.””
Yup.
It seems to me, regarding RR being a possible White Hat, and q having never said either way, what Q have done is repeatedly say, paraphrased, WATCH RR. I wonder if the directions for all eyes on RR are preparing us for some sleight-of-hand move in some other direction.
Where’s the $400,000,000 line item from Browder on
Hillary’s campaign reports??
??????
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I confess I missed that story, and it seems to be a big one. Would you be willing to provide me with more data? When it comes to the Clintons, it is an overwhelming amount of skullduggery to keep track of. [Such smelly things, too.] At any rate, I’m not up to speed on this one. Thanks in advance for your elaboration of this info.
I sent him my last $1.88
ROFL
:: and q having never said either way ::
Yes, Q did say. Read the crumbs. Learn the language.
Russians are clever, and generally entrepreneurial when allowed to be.
Finland have a fine looking First Lady.
Praying Medic has a video up on his twitter page that talks about what he actually heard Putin say through his translator. Very interesting. praying medic twitter
Having known quite a few Russian nationals, I find it safe to say that, as a people, they would be suspicious of a stray cat unless they can find some personal gain in interfacing it with it.
Hard not to breed that out of a people who in 1918 had lived beneath the surveillance of an intelligence service for four full years prior to the revolution.
If that’s all you know, then yeah.
That said, money talks.
Looks like $400 million dollars that was taken out of the Russia illegally, without paying Russia or US taxes.
That $400 million went into Hillary’s Campaign. (!!!!!!!)
So. Where is that line item in her Campaign Report?? People are looking & CAN’T FIND IT... :-O
Also see this: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3671305/posts
The number of interviews Strzok conducted (or more likely failed to conduct) between date X and date Y (can’t remember the dates) is hugely important. I don’t quite understand why (Can someone help me out here?) PS and the democrats were wetting themselves trying to prevent him from answering this. They even tried to adjourn the hearing. So obviously very important, but why? I assume the Rs knew exactly what they were doing and why they asked about this and so did the Ds.
******
As I recall from watching/listening to the hearing, Trey Gowdy pointed out that he already knew the answer to the question. Strock had conducted ZERO interviews between date X and date Y.
Yes, some things did come out of the hearings. For me, the biggest was Gohmert’s assertion that all but four of the HRC 30,000 email batch went to unauthorized destinations. And I also believe Louie said “and not Russia”.
So, to me, the Rs had a fairly orchestrated throwing out of the apples. Now...I’m trying to reconcile the timeline of Gohmert’s assertion.
There was breaking news about those emails and about what Gohmert said during the hearing. Was HE first to throw this out or were the news breaks first?
SCOPE OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE Legal assistance under this Treaty shall include: (1) obtaining testimony and statements; (2) providing documents, records, and other items; (3) serving documents; (4) locating and identifying persons and items; (5) executing requests for searches and seizures; (6) transferring persons in custody for testimony or other purposes under this Treaty; (7) locating and immobilizing assets for purposes of forfeiture, restitution, or collection of fines; and (8) providing any other legal assistance not prohibited by the laws of the Requested Party. ARTICLE 3 CENTRAL AUTHORITIES AND PROCEDURES FOR COMMUNICATIONS 1. Each Party shall implement the provisions of this Treaty, including the making and receiving of requests, through its Central Authority. 2. For the United States of America, the Central Authority shall be the Attorney General or persons designated by the Attorney General. For the Russian Federation, the Central Authority shall be the Office of the Procurator General of the Russian Federation or persons designated by the Procurator General. 3. The Central Authorities shall communicate directly with one another for the purposes of this Treaty and may agree upon such practical measures as may be necessary to facilitate the implementation of this Treaty.
So what would the honorable Mr. Sessions do if the Russians requested assistance under this treaty to investigate Hillary?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.