Works for me!
I have a couple of new theories. :-)
1. Re: Bannon, Tillerson, Scaramucci, and a few others who were briefly part of the Trump administration.
1.a. Some of these guys were black hats and were allowed in in order to watch them. In essence, Trump gave them enough rope so they could hang themselves.
1.b. Some of these guys were white hats and were allowed in in order to brief them on their mission, on their part of the plan. These were the guys who work best as independent operators and/or who were far more useful on the “outside” than on the inside. (I suspect Bannon is in this category. If you haven’t seen his recent interview (on Dutch TV?) defending the Trump plan against a foreign MSM troll, I recommend it. Smackdown! Bannon did not stay on defense; he went on the offensive. Just like POTUS!)
2. Kind of an extension to the excellent theories being floated by _Imperator_Rex_ and others who have laid out a sensible timeline that tells us WHY we need to be patient until after the midterms. (Thanks to all of them as well as some outstanding FReeQs who have expanded on this theme and reassured the impatient among us! Myself included, at times. In addition to Q’s role as one of the 4 major educational outlets for getting around the MSM and preparing people for DS revelations and arrests, I believe that Q has an additional extra function. With Q, the Trump team can release or hint at new and/or shocking information. Then the team can observe the reaction to see if the public is ready, to see how the information is received. This lets them know where the speed bumps are and where they are going to have to work harder to win public acceptance for the truth.
IMHO, One way we FReeQs can contribute to part 2 is to spend more time discussing some of the more uncomfortable bits of info that Q tells us or hints at. And we should continue our already excellent anti-trolling mission. Keep explaining to trolls what the FACTS are. Don’t let them clog up threads with name-calling, rather persist in answering their rants with a calm statement of facts. An exceptionally good way to do this is to give them links to MSM articles that support the facts. (Maybe we should start compiling such a list? and add it to our resource list?)