|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posted on 07/03/2018 10:12:09 PM PDT by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan” YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction YouTube Thoughts Not Bots Who is Q - 4 min - quick overview Article Conservative Treehouse Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview Anonymous What is Q? - 31 point introduction Anonymous The Book of Q - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary “Pay Attention” Thread Qanon.pub Q drops - created by Q on Q’s 8chan board “The Truth Is Spreading” Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference “Power to the People” YouTube Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drops YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links ImperatorRex Includes Q-drop reactions Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More” YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected - 6 min Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
Hahahahahahaha. Now that's what I called advanced research, edzo
Careful you don't get on the Secret Service watch list. Ooops, too late.
Okay based on your fine efforts, I now am convinced that Potus_Schedule @Twitter is as bogus as Joe Biden's hair. Now I will have to be convinced it's for rizzle.
#ThePingPongOfLife @BagsterIsCool.
Bagster
Thank you for your diligence; so that is settled. It is not an official POTUS schedule.
LOL, tell me about it! ;-)
Humans, of course, aren't absolutely uniform... '-)
They don’ t.
None of the available POTUS Schedules anywhere show everything.
None seem to show otherwise unknowable future scheduled events, if they show any “days away” future events at all. Any actionable info of that nature is likely disinformation.
They are all more of a log, than a schedule.
It seems only one Twitter based schedlue shows what could be a Trump Team professional level of Human Input. (The one Twitter points everyone to first.)
I’m the odd bird then because I wear my watch on my right wrist and I’m right-handed.
Whispering on social media is that we have broken the algorithm designed to suppress and stop us!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Are you able to elaborate on that wonderful snippet of news, Cat’s PJs?
What are they saying? How / what are we doing specifically? I want to do MORE of it! LOL!
That is a great article about Q! ThanQ!
I heard that yesterday-—it was NOT in her diary but in papers at an Ann Frank Institute somewhere——and may be true.
.
Seems that the POTUS schedule with Q-y statements may well be put out by a Trump team person, yet it is “unofficial”, what do you think?
Re: White House Press Office - President’s schedule
...they do not publish the President’s schedule on the whitehouse.gov site, Facebook, Twitter, or elsewhere due to obvious security concerns.
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
edzo4... I appreciate your logic and precision in determining what is confirmed, what is fact, and what is proof.
There is plenty of room for speculation at FR, but when something is presented as fact I want it to be confirmed to the highest degree possible.
JFK only served 1000 days.
Follow JFK’s 1000 Days in Office 50 Years Later, on Twitter
John F. Kennedy’s Vision of Peace
JFK’s predecessor, Dwight D. Eisenhower, had finalized support on March 17th, 1960, for a Cuban invasion by anti-Castro insurgents, but the wily general left its execution to the incoming Kennedy team. From the start, JFK recoiled at the caper’s stench, as CIA Director Allen Dulles has acknowledged, demanding assurances from CIA and Pentagon brass that there was no chance of failure and that there would be no need for U.S. military involvement. Dulles and the generals knowingly lied and gave him those guarantees. When the invasion failed, JFK refused to order airstrikes against Castro. Realizing he had been drawn into a trap, he told his top aides, David Powers and Kenneth O’Donnell, “They were sure I’d give in to them and send the go-ahead order to the [U.S. Navy aircraft carrier] Essex. They couldn’t believe that a new president like me wouldn’t panic and try to save his own face. Well, they had me figured all wrong.” JFK was realizing that the CIA posed a monumental threat to American democracy. As the brigade faltered, he told Arthur Schlesinger that he wanted to “splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.”
An inside job: CIA a suspect for some in JFK's killing
CIA officials were reportedly deeply angered by Kennedy’s lack of support in the failed Bay of Pigs invasion to oust Cuba's Fidel Castro, a debacle that cost Dulles his job in 1961. Conspiracy buffs argue that Dulles's firing incited plans for an assassination. Kennedy was even once quoted in a New York Times report, by an anonymous source said to be a trusted aide, as saying he wanted "to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds," following the Bay of Pigs.
Think the CIA isn't that petty? Think Again.
Chuck Schumer tells Trump the intelligence community can get back at you six ways from Sunday
The CIA denies it...
The Lie That Linked CIA to the Kennedy Assassination
For years, Soviet propagandists had sought to impugn the United States by linking it to France’s brutal colonial war in Algeria. The effort was a mediocre success until 22 April 1961, when four Algerian-based generals organized a putsch against President Charles de Gaulle, who was trying to extract France from the seven-year conflict. Coincidentally, one of the plotters, Air Force Gen. Maurice Challe, had served in NATO headquarters and was unusually pro-American for a senior French officer. This fact provided the basis for a fabrication that the plotters enjoyed the CIA’s support.
“This lie was first printed on the 23rd of April by a Rome daily,” Helms testified. In English, the headline in Paese Sera read, “Was the Military Coup d’état in Algeria Prepared in Consultation with Washington?” The very next day, Pravda, citing Paese Sera, ran a story alleging CIA support for the revolt, as did TASS and Radio Moscow. Other Soviet Bloc and then Western outlets picked up the story, which gathered credibility with every re-telling. Eventually Le Monde, the most respected and influential newspaper in France, ran a lead editorial that began, “It now seems established that some American agents more or less encouraged Challe.” The vehemence of the US Embassy’s denial was primarily taken as an indication of the allegation’s truth.
Numb nut liberals believe this crap. Especially the the indoctrinated kids in school. The condescending way it was delivered. Just amazing.
I would expect some of these big players can actually walk many places with impunity. The underbelly world of crime and corruption ANSWERS to these people to a certain degree and when someone big wants to walk someplace like that they might have a few undercover guys but you know the “word on the street” is mess with this person/group and you’d better have your affairs in order...
BEcause Roosevelt didn’t like the Jewish.
Exactly!
.
[Right-handers wear their watch on their left wrist]
I’m left handed and wear a watch on my left hand.
[Speaking of overdue how about that q&a we were teased about?]
Speaking of overdue, were all DOJ DOCUMENTS turned over today?
Dang Tex,
When Q asks us what questions were asked about SA, you step up don’t you. It was important to post the answer to that Q question and you did it.
Now for the analysis...
Q tells us the martial law stuff was disinfo but the Saudi stuff was real. Then asks uhat questions were asked about SA.
Now we know. So why did he ask this way back then and why is he retelling us? Only to point out the disinformation part or the SA part?
(damn, you’re good.)
I swear this Q team is frikkin’ awesome. I’ll put us up agains the 8channers any day.
Bagster
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I love the very kind words, baggie - and I certainly agree with your assessment of the caliber of minds we have hanging out here, but I honestly don’t recall doing what you say I did!
*texokie looking around.... huh? who me??..texokie doubts she is the one really being addressed, but gamely crawls out from under the covfefe table to offer speculation*
These are my thoughts and impressions only - not based on specific bunny holing, so they may be wildly wrong:
NEVERTHELESS:
*texokie takes a deep breath*
Q asked us at that earlier time those questions in order to prepare the ground to receive the full, amplified “real” info, once it could become appropriate to reveal it. He also wanted to have us examine as much as we could get our hands on to try to see what was really going on that was not being reported. It was NOT a “Lone Gunman”shooter in LV, but part of a much bigger picture.
There WAS disinformation. For some reason, the LV event could not be openly discussed by this administration - and there was evidence of domestic Black hat Pushmepullyou activities which could not be acknowledge for some reason, possibly because of some kind of outplay of events in SA which was in the midst of its own civil war/martial law scenario.
As I understand it, the LV event was a spillover into the US by the Black Burnoose factions in the Saudi family/govt. I’m speculating that perhaps the agreement with Trump/US and the SA King had not been completely solidified, so could not be openly acknowledged til we had the Sword dance with the White Burnoose factions of SA and other nations in the region who had signed on.
We sorted out a lot of the back story at the time, and more was revealed in the meantime. Now Q is having us revisit all of it to sort it out some more and see what shakes out. ..... but Q may still have some constraints on telling or pointing at the fuller explanation, and wants us to find further developments on open source before doing so?
So IMHO, he really is possibly pointing at BOTH. There was disinformation, but perhaps not exactly what was figured out at the first drop. And he’s pointing out the SA part because of the same reason.
We now have Alwaleed muzzled (his post-confinement interviews/statements are fascinating) and others now dead or brought to heel, it appears. So have things perhaps changed or at least settled in and solidified since the original drop?
And I’m getting a dim bell clang here that there was that night when it was reported that the Saudi palace had some kind of drone attack? I do not recall that we ever satisfactorily cleared that one up. Or if we did, I didn’t see it. Which is possible.
What is the back story NOW? What is happening that we need to know that also is not being reported? And which Q cannot directly mention? We’ve seen mention of info (very slight) recently about the LV event. Why?
Does the Project Pelican/Gulftainer out of UAE and the whole CEMENT/ human trafficking thing have any relevance here? I have been wondering for some time if there is a solid connection to the Black Burnoose factions in SA to the UAE/Gulftainer activities. I don’t know. I did try looking, but was not able to find a way to frame my search perimeters to give me a result. There may not be any connection, but it would not surprise me if there were.
I don’t know if that is helpful, but I’m always happy to give it a shot!
*texokie goes to fridge for a nice big slug of whipped cream to put into her covfefe before resuming her battle station under the covfefe table.*
:-D
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
