...I feel like this whole Q thing, this whole Deep State thing, is like a gigantic jigsaw puzzle. Still a LOT of pieces missing, but I can clearly make out a red rose in this corner, a boat up there, and a flock of birds in the sky up at the top. But over there is still a big hole, plus a lot of smaller holes, and we haven’t got all the edge pieces in yet.
I firmly believe that just because we’ve heard a theory that makes sense, that doesn’t mean we should stop looking or stop brainstorming. The additional ideas might fit somewhere else or they might sharpen the images that we already have...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I really like that puzzle on the table analogy, generally. And I agree that we should keep ALL pieces on the table until we can prove it does not fit - but maybe belongs to the puzzle we worked with last week or is actually a dried up piece of ham the vacuum didn’t reach....or something
The problem is that the puzzle pieces that don’t yet fit can overwhelm. Successful puzzle solvers frequently organize their unused pieces by various criteria that let them know when the time is right to examine them more closely. Pure random pieces laying out in equal importance more often just confuse the issues.