Posted on 06/20/2018 10:49:53 PM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.
If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos
Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub
QProofs provide evidence that Q Anon is a legitimate source of information, has access to President Trump, and is serving President Trump's agenda:
https://www.qproofs.com/home.html
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index
Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump
Are you Morpheus?
"No one can be told what the matrix is. You have to see it for yourself."
It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
Bagster
Bagster
the resistance...the real resistance..
If you don’t even know who wrote and directed The Matrix then the rest of your theory doesn’t mean JackAll....
And THAT, Jack Black, is what you get when the egg-heads take over a movement. That mish mash of pseudo-intellectual words salad bears no resemblance to the original "alt-right" movement, which was nothing more than the younger generation of conservative Americans. All that B.S. and more was applied to it by pompous poindexters and the left.
In other words, the "alt-right" was a breakaway movement from what we now call the RINOS or "establishment" conservatives and we see as just another wing of the Deep State.
"Alt-right" was an empty vessel that people shoveled their crap into. For example, that horseshit you just quoted.
Bagster
thanks for the link - this is a good read!!! whatever happens with it, it is a walk down memory lane for the Clinton Cartel..
https://ia801505.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.uscourts.dcd.197752/gov.uscourts.dcd.197752.1.0.pdf
Exaaaaaaactly, C-cat. And not just FR conservatives, but the entire #GreatAwakening movement. How alt-right got into the conversation I'll never know.
That's exactly how the blossoming alt-right movement was destroyed by the left. By tying it to fascism and naziism. Once the "alt-right" was so labelled, they could then tie any conservative or right wing individual or movement to the "alt-right" and BAM...discredited.
I really hope that's not what your trying to do, Jack. I did have such high hopes for you.
Always the optimist.
Bagster
Please try to have some intellectual integrity, OK. You can read the referring posts backwards, quite easily.
I didn't post this gratuitously, or claim that it has any connection with what most people on Free Republic believe. I mentioned that the term "red pill" was used by Vox Day and other alt-right types (who, in turn, I brought up because he wrote several posts on Q).
I was asked what his "16 points" were and I posted them.
I tend to answer direct questions as clearly as I can.
The alt-right BS was this made up BS to do just that.
So, your theory is that the Alt Right was made up to reflect badly on conservatism? That's ridiculous. It's not a position that anyone who has done even the most superficial reading could believe.
The Alt Right has it's own pedigree and history. Whether you like it, hate it, or don't care about it is your choice. But it certainly is not a left-wing plot to stealthily attack conservatism.
The history of the Alt Right is readily available. The first use of term was in Taki Mag, among a group of people who were younger writers who were broadly aligned with the paleo-conservatives. Richard Spencer, who coined the term, was an editor at Pat Buchanan's "The American Conservative" before moving on to Taki Mag where he came up with the term Alt Right, along with Paul Gottfried.
There have always been disagreements in the conservative movement, and the National Review vs. The American Conservative conflict was pretty well known by people who were paying attention to the various streams of Conservative thought in the early 2000s.
Do you claim that Pat Buchanan is not a real Conservative?
Both sides of the Neo-Con and Paleo-Con divide claim the other are not "real conservatives". Perhaps you feel you alone can decide what a "real conservative is? Please, enlighten us!
If you were a true Constitutional conservative, you would understand this.
I am sure I understand the Constitution as well as you do. Stop with the condescension.
You will have to understand not all conservatives are white, like myself, and many conservatives, regardless of skin color, who do not agree with this BS at all.
I do understand that not all Conservatives are white. Do you understand that not all conservatives are National Review types?
If you understood our founding documents, All Men Are Created Equal and most Constitutional freedom-loving conservatives understand this I have found throughout my life having met many of these conservatives.
Again, I understand the Constitution as well as you do. So do many of the people on the Alt Right. You would claim that they are mis-interpreting it, they would claim the same of you.
I'm quite familiar with your arguments, and those of Constitutional Conservatives, but I doubt you you are at all familiar with theirs. By the way, please note I said "theirs" and not MINE.
Nice try with that BS,
Nice try with pretending that people who disagree with you are simply wrong, without actually debating any of their points. Usually that's a liberal tactic. It's a form of "ad hominem" argumentation, a sign of a weak grasp of your own position.
I still don't trust you.
I never asked you to trust me, and I don't really care if you trust me. I don't know you, even by handle. You've been here 5 years, I've been here 20. Stick around, you might learn something.
Oh, no! I made a mistake on the name of of a Hollywood Sibling Director Team vs. another! How could I do that?
I guess my knowledge of Hollywood trivia is second rate. It was Wachowski Brothers, not the Cohen Brothers.
Oh me, oh my!
And, thanks for the correction.
Lisa Mei Crowley @LisaMei62 3h3 hours ago More Lisa Mei Crowley Retweeted Donald J. Trump "Full moon coming" = "(Full) transparency _ DECLAS?" Next full moon on Wed night (27/28 Jun). EO compelling declassification coming on Wed?
Same crap different day. You try so hard to get people here to trust you and utterly fail every time.
I just wonder why you bother. What is your fascination with these threads?
I’ve been around FR since 1998 and have admitted many times so who is the one being condescending?
You have way too much nuance about alt-right for my liking. Nuance IS a liberal thing. By your own posting it ties white supremacy to the alt-right. That is what was intended to do and tie today’s good Constitutional conservatism to white supremacy.
Why do you think Hilliary Rotten Clinton and other deep staters uses that phrase all the time???? It is obviously trying to marginalize good freedom-loving conservatives, no doubt. Keep nuancing this fake alt-right and I will continue to post why I don’t trust it or you.
CGato
Had to laugh when I read this post on 8ch because take out Twatter and insert FReeQRepublic and it would be my kids describing me. They are kinda awed/embarrassed I go on the chans and follow Q drops. Red pilling in progress.
“FWIW my mom lurks here occasionally and thinks we’re all retarded and genius at the same time kek. She has a hard time keeping up with the bread pace and constant posting of the babes, so she mostly sticks to twatter, but she’s still hard-core for Q and appreciates what we do here. Different strokes for different folks, is all. The info’s all that matters.”
(BTW I am so not tech savvy I don’t know how to underline, italic, slant, etc.)
“Respect the truth - It will prevail”
For the Truth to prevail, it has to get out.
Getting the truth out requires Free Speech and people willing to dig it out from under the lies and speak it.
But most of us tend to succumb to some degree of political correctness when in polite, or even impolite company.
Respect for the Truth and political correctness may be pieces of the same puzzle, but they are certainly not pieces that fit tightly together.
One thing I’m coming to believe about 8chan is that it is first, and foremost, an anonymous “cesspool” of free speech. A lot of the posted porn there is just anonymous defiant free speech. It also seems to get posted a lot as thanks for some truth digging some other Anon did.
Since all the fish in this 8chan pool are anonymous, anything an Anon fish says can be analyzed on content by the school. If a fish submits poor content, that content can get quickly shredded by some rather gifted shredders.
Some content gets “Noted” (not to imply endorsed) in a section near the top of the Q Research threads.
Apparently some people blessed with autism find the environment; anonymous, content based, puzzle rich, and lacking in political correctness demands, just about perfect.
They are free to thrive on the anonymous school’s assessment of the intellectual merit of content they can freely and anonymously post. Or they can just entertain themselves making connections, solving puzzles and exploring rabbit holes.
Free Speech! All are treated with equal ruthlessness.
Add to the mix, trolls, shills, and spooks from who knows how many countries dumping tons of their own content. Flat Earth, new age, fringe UFO, mysticism, racism, every kind of mangled conspiracy theory, and some stuff so ugly it cannot be forgotten. (Try not to hit the filter button too late.)
Now add Q on top of all that and some of that too ugly to be forgotten stuff starts sprouting visible connections to Deep State actors and their tools. Autists become interested and engaged. As future proves past, truth starts to prevail.
People smarter than me, with bulletproof free speech skin (or the full armor of God) and following effective security practices to maintain their anonymity, and/or people with certain forms of autism may be the only kinds of people that can be truly comfortable there. (And anarchists... Let’s not forget the anarchists.)
There is a battle being fought there, though. A battle in a war that needs to be won if Truth is to prevail.
Truth will prevail.
It's interesting that the "Who to Follow" recommendation section for me on her Twitter page points to three other hot blondes. Apparently people who follow Ms. Thulin like to follow beautiful women in general. (Or else the other women are also Q fans -- and just happen to be hot blondes.)
LoL This just posted:
>>1883465
>FWIW my mom lurks here occasionally and thinks we’re all retarded and genius at the same time kek. She has a hard time keeping up with the bread pace and constant posting of the babes, so she mostly sticks to twatter, but she’s still hard-core for Q and appreciates what we do here. Different strokes for different folks, is all. The info’s all that matters.
Hey dude, you just described me (except for the Twatter - @Jack is vulgar. You anons and autists are the absolute best. Keep up the good work and help us normies understand Q and what’s coming so we can all save this great nation. I am awe struck by the talent, hard work, humor and naughty pictures here.
WWG1WWA>>1883465
POTUS has many indictments if it were no true i would have told you so
____________________________________
:D I like your style!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.