Q Anon: FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops

qanon.pub ^ | 6/13/2018 | FReepers, Vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[Steven W.]

The executive summary reads like it was written by RR

[Steven W.]

Let’s be careful to specify ORIGINAL report -remember, the “unredacted” report currently in the picture is the same prepared + modified by RR, only without the additional redactions.

[bitt]

DO WE KNOW whether this is ‘redacted’? We want the full report and all changes, as requested by reps.

[Cboldt]

-- This report is a really bad joke ... --

Circumstantial evidence is good enough to convict you or me, but when it comes to finding wroing by the government, they have to leave solid tracks in black and white.

Time for another revolution.

[eldoradude]

This report is a really bad joke :(

Complete whitewash. The recommendations...BS

II. Recommendations
For these reasons, and as more fully described in previous chapters, we recommend the following:

1. The Department and the FBI consider developing practice guidance that would assist investigators and prosecutors in identifying the general risks with and alternatives to permitting a witness to attend a voluntary interview of another witness, in particular when the witness is serving as counsel for the other witness.

2. The Department consider making explicit that, except in situations where the law requires or permits disclosure, an investigating agency cannot publicly announce its recommended charging decision prior to consulting with the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, or his or her designee, and cannot proceed without the approval of one of these officials.

3. The Department and the FBI consider adopting a policy addressing the appropriateness of Department employees discussing the conduct of uncharged individuals in public statements.

4. The Department consider providing guidance to agents and prosecutors concerning the taking of overt investigative steps, indictments, public announcements, or other actions that could impact an election.

5. The Office of the Deputy Attorney General consider taking steps to improve the retention and monitoring of text messages Departmentwide.

6. The FBI add a warning banner to all of the FBI’s mobile phones and mobile devices in order to further notify users that they have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

7. The FBI consider (a) assessing whether it has provided adequate training to employees about the proper use of text messages and instant messages, including any related discovery obligations, and (b) providing additional guidance about the allowable uses of FBI devices for any non-governmental purpose, including guidance about the use of FBI devices for political conversations

8. The FBI consider whether (a) it is appropriately educating employees about both its media contact policy and the Department’s ethics rules pertaining to the acceptance of gifts, and (b) its disciplinary provisions and penalties are sufficient to deter such improper conduct.

9. Department ethics officials consider implementing a review of campaign donations when Department employees or their spouses run for public office.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Q

[conservativesister]

Finally hit me what I thought looked strange at the first handshake between Trump & Kim at the summit.
WHY were there no gold braids on the American Flags.
Trump has always been particular about how they drop down the front of the flag.
Any thoughts?

[StormFlag]

Typical recommendation..”.consider” changes vs “will make changes”

No required changes....

[No_Doll_i]

Maybe this version is not worth the trouble to report on.

What do you guys think? Wait til the Original is out?

Thanks!

[Steven W.]

the gold tassels are ceremonial - may be appropriate later at some time but not there + then ;)

[bitt]

I agree - it’s fairly obvious to interpretation - anyone can take the time to read it - let’s just post responses from
KNOWN GOOD GUYS as to what they intent to do!!

This looks like a [RR] apologia....

stand down, diligent freeqs!

[Cboldt]

https://twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1007330850483179520

We were deeply troubled by text messages sent by Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, when one senior FBI official, Strzok, who was helping to lead the Russia investigation at the time, conveys in a text message to another senior FBI official, Page, that "we'll stop" candidate Trump from being elected--after other extensive text messages between the two disparaging candidate Trump--it is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a

420

willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate's electoral prospects. This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice. Moreover, as we describe in Chapter Nine, in assessing Strzok's decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop in October 2016, these text messages led us to conclude that we did not have confidence that Strzok's decision was free from bias.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

I’ve read the #3.
I can wait.

[blu]

It’s all just a frikkin’ whitewash. All problems can be solved by more training and more splash screens to remind agents that they have no expectation of privacy when using organization devices.

Gah, our school board has more teeth!!!! What a f’n ripoff!

[buffaloguy]

I wonder if the Navy has splashed the sub that launched the m1 missile at Alaska.

Anyone know?

[Steven W.]

That is inconsistent with other parts of the report - it's been scrubbed!

We further found that the statute that required the most complex analysis by the prosecutors was Section 793(f)(1), the “gross negligence” provision that has been the focus of much of the criticism of the declination decision. As we describe in Chapters Two and Seven of our report, the prosecutors analyzed the legislative history of Section 793(f)(1), relevant case law, and the Department’s prior interpretation of the statute. They concluded that Section 793(f)(1) likely required a state of mind that was “so gross as to almost suggest deliberate intention,” criminally reckless, or “something that falls just short of being willful,” as well as evidence that the individuals who sent emails containing classified information “knowingly” included or transferred such information onto unclassified systems. The Midyear team concluded that such proof was lacking. We found that this interpretation of Section 793(f)(1) was consistent with the Department’s historical approach in prior cases under different leadership, including in the 2008 decision not to prosecute former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales for mishandling classified documents.

We analyzed the Department’s declination decision according to the same analytical standard that we applied to other decisions made during the investigation. We did not substitute the OIG’s judgment for the judgments made by the Department, but rather sought to determine whether the decision was based on improper considerations, including political bias. We found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations; rather, we determined that they were based on the prosecutors’ assessment of the facts, the law, and past Department practice. We therefore concluded that these were legal and policy judgments involving core prosecutorial discretion that were for the Department to make.

Except those determinations were made by Comey & F-I - instead of the D-J - which they said was insubordination. This report is inherently contradictory. Sickening. Sad.

[Cboldt]

I don't think it is urgent to read at this point. So many eyes on this right now, the hot spots will surface pretty quickly.

See, e.g. Mark Meadows, Nunes and others. Plus we have the Grassley softball hearing coming up.

There is evidence of bias all over the place, then the OIG says "no evidence of bias." Shades of "Hillary did nothing wrong."

[stars & stripes forever]

[It’s all just a frikkin’ whitewash.]

NOT acceptable! We the People DEMAND Justice!

[COUNTrecount]

Everyone, sign the petition and let them know we want the truth!

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/unredacted-declassification-department-justice-inspector-general-report-public-viewing

[PMAS]

OIG report
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download