Replies

I hardly am an “interloper invader” since I am an FR member (who actually supports FR financially). The fact that you and your conspiratorial friends don't like questions or criticisms does not make me unable to post because you don't like it.

No, Okey, you knew exactly what this thread concerns and you came into it and started insulting the participants. You did not seriously address the content of the issues. You posted NO questions and no substantive criticism. You made an assertion that had zero substantive or probative value. . . and you started insulting Q and Q thread participants. THAT MEANS YOU ARE A THREAD TROLL.

Your posts show you really know nothing about what you were posting about, using only what you've heard third hand about Q. You haven't invested ANY time before making an ignorant post insulting those who have.

It doesn't matter what you donate to Freerepublic. That does not buy you a free pass to insult OTHER FR members many of whom are also donators.

You didn't come into this thread to contribute considered, thoughtful criticism, you came here to throw thoughtless brickbats and your ignorant insult feces. You only got back in kind what YOU started by trying to muddy the waters and disrupt the thread. You are well aware that was what your post was intended to accomplish, otherwise, what was these intended to accomplish:

"More likely Q is sitting on his bed in the basement waiting for his mom to announce that dinner is ready." . . .

"Oh, cmon! I forgot to mention that my hobby is mocking Q adherents! (Just kidding).". . . .

"Sorry, i dont understand a word you wrote. But then again, I am not a Qook."

Not one of these was in response to what I would consider an insult, yet you denigrated the Freepers who replied to you, insulting them and the participants of the thread in general. Why are YOU compelled to police the threads because YOU do not understand it?

So now Q is not a "mom's basement" dweller but a GROUP of 8Chans who conspired to create a fake LARP Q persona? Which is it, Okey? Pick one. Stick with your insider story.

Apparently you are basing this ad hoc claim on a SINGLE discredited source? I've read that "long posted confession of a person" who CLAIMS, he, together with his friends, created the Q persona. . . but it doesn't hold together.

First of all, he comes across as someone who would never have participated in the Q "conspiracy" in the first place with his attitude about the philosophy Q espoused. He drips condescension toward such a philosophy and his obvious derision for those who would espouse or follow its tenets. He did NOT post his confession in the research channel, but elsewhere, where it had to be "discovered" and his cherry picked examples are just that. He avoids anything that presaged later events and mentions only those in his "confession" only those that were already known prior to Q bringing them in, but ignores those Q brought in prior to public knowledge. He did not answer the tough questions about impossible graphics posted by Q. . . or any others that could have only been answered by someone with inside Q knowledge. He is the LARPer, not Q, Okeydoker.

This guy with his "guilty conscience" and his claims did not stand up to the investigation from the Anons who dug into him and his attempt to discredit Q. His so called "confession" fell apart quite rapidly. The people he named simply did not have the expertise or knowledge he attributed to them to pull it off, nor could he point to any sources of the graphics he claimed were conveniently "found on the internet" that were incapable of being searched for because they "tweaked them with overlays" (not possible).

Q has been validated by making predictions that were validated by later events, things some LARPING nobodies could not have had access to, even a group of non-entities occupying 8Chan would not have such an encyclopedic knowledge of world events that Q has shown.

Now, go play your troll games elsewhere.