Q Anon: (5/12/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 5/12/18 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Has anyone told Candace that the DNC has new mules from MayHeeKo?

[JockoManning]

Thanks.

[rolling_stone]

federal conspiracy statutes begin to run from the last overt act of the conspiracy...

https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-652-statute-limitations-conspiracy

652. Statute of Limitations for Conspiracy
Conspiracy is a continuing offense. For statutes such as 18 U.S.C. § 371, which require an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, the statute of limitations begins to run on the date of the last overt act. See Fiswick v. United States, 329 U.S. 211 (1946); United States v. Butler, 792 F.2d 1528 (11th Cir. 1986). For conspiracy statutes which do not require proof of an overt act, such as RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1961) or 21 U.S.C. § 846, the government must allege and prove that the conspiracy continued into the limitations period. The crucial question in this regard is the scope of the conspiratorial agreement, and the conspiracy is deemed to continue until its purpose has been achieved or abandoned. See United States v. Northern Imp. Co., 814 F.2d 540 (8th Cir. 1987); United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 (1984).

An individual’s “withdrawal” from a conspiracy starts the statute of limitations running as to that individual. “Withdrawal” from a conspiracy for this purpose means that the conspirator must take affirmative action by making a clean breast to the authorities or communicating his or her disassociation to the other conspirators. See United States v. Gonzalez, 797 F.2d 915 (10th Cir. 1986).

[fatima]

Here's one This poster is famous for removing links. Has Picture of Schiff with eyes wide open buging out. 72 SECONDS ‏ @55true4u 3h3 hours ago More Allison Mack [NXIVM] arrested [date]? When does a bird sing? Schneiderman resigns [date]? Coincidence? Eyes Wide Open. Who will be next? Watch NYC. Watch CA. Q

Allison Mack [NXIVM] arrested [date]?
When does a bird sing?
Schneiderman resigns [date]?
Coincidence?
Eyes Wide Open.
Who will be next?
Watch NYC.
Watch CA.
Q#NXIVM #QAnon 👇 pic.twitter.com/CvKvXtA1ZS— 72 SECONDS (@55true4u) May 15, 2018

[txhurl]

I’m listening to ancient Egyptian music and my mind is furring out.

---

Don’t bogart that ‘Egyptian’, my....

[StormFlag]

MAGA

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Just about due for a collaborative re-boot?

[SERKIT]

Corrected spelling error. D'oh!

[defconw]

I should have grabbed it. Dang IT!

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Bkmk

[JockoManning]

I didn’t see how long the statute of limitations is in years for conspiracy.

[RitaOK]

You may have landed on it. When in a real trap, sympathy has always been Hillary’s “Keystone”.

Her endless Trail of Tears performance, since she LOST, is all about that. She is badly in debt to ALL those she failed and is probably tired of trying to pay them back, tilling the earth for cash, as well.

Perhaps this dying swan business is for their eyes. ARF! ARF!

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™

[bitt]

RICO = ‘TRUMPS’ statute of Limitations, yes???

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™

[txhurl]

BTW, Smoky makes a good living off those voices. Once they light upon the correct ‘circuit’, it’ll light up brighter’n Dallas in here.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Q

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™