Q Anon: (5/4/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 5/4/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Each live stream video remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronym definitions to help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

Click the following link for the latest edition of the Bagster Bee.

#~~~THE BAGSTER BEE~~~#

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[Disestablishmentarian]

For these reasons it is clear that AG Sessions is operating under the cover of incompetence while doing the hard work of gathering the cases against the treasonous deep state and politicians with the Presidents full support.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Exactly. Sometimes it is hard for me to see why everyone can't see it the way you have laid it out.

[Wneighbor]

Thank you again for The Bagster Daily Quorum. I’m a little bit glad of no Q drops because I have no study time. Even java will not give me time to join Q today. I am a LOT sorry we did not have a major 5.5 cinco de mayo roundup and lynching of the usual suspects but slow and steady wins the race.

To all, God Bless You, all here are in my prayers along with PDJT, Q, white hats, the great USofA, our families, friends and all those who need to know Christ and become red-pilled.

[greeneyes]

Unfortunately, I think the D/S has compromised the EU/NATO group years ago. I have never supported the UN. Too bad there was no Henry Cabot Lodge to defeat that like he did the League of Nations.

Heck Goldwater and Schlafly warned about what we call the D/S and LSM successfully convinced most Americans that they were fruitcakes.

Schlafly wrote about the Bilderberg group. It was decades before I was able to find any additional info on them. Many people said they didn’t exist. And yet they did.

[xone]

If you never had the pain, don’t discount opioids. Nothing works like them. Had back to back use of 90+ day with 90 days in between. I realize some may become addicted, but frankly I have a Tango Sierra approach to them. Opioids do the job they are prescribed to do. Only a heartless person would deny the pain relief they offer.

[xone]

Ooorah brother.

[greeneyes]

I think you may be overlooking the redacted sections of the authorizations. Since the SC claims they are not relevant to the Manafort issues, they could be targeting the HRC campaign.
*************************************************************
Not really. My question pertained to written vs verbal instructions, I assumed that the redacted portions might cover something we’d be happy with or even something we might not like so much.

Redaction was not generic to the issue I was interested in clarifying. I am relieved that a Judge who seems to have some sense will be reviewing it at least. I can wait to hear what the redaction is though I’d like to know right now. LOL

[Cboldt]

-- The more friction there "seems" to be between the House/Senate committees and the DOJ the more people's ears prick up. The liberal media salivates. Twitter world goes nuts. After a week or more of eyes-on the situation the DOJ "caves', the committees get the info they want. --

The dynamic is there, but I think the motives are institutional protection (some justified, some not) rather than a desire to gin up public interest.

There is a good reason that the branches of government compete, check and balance, and are not totally transparent with each other.

Law enforcement has many secrets. So does foreign affairs. The justification for keeping substantial chunks secret is pretty good. The world runs partly on subterfuge, brinkmanship, and secrets. With investigations, assume the FBI was investigating a congressman as a foreign agent. Should Congress have a right to see that? maybe better asked, under what circumstances and when (and who) should see that? Of if a congressman is known to be a conduit for information back to a political party that uses hit-teams to take out political opponents. How much do you share with Schiff? Feinstein?

Think of the rules of the game as though your enemies will use the same rules and have the same powers you propose to give to "your guys."

I've pondered long and hard about how to expose and dispose of the DS players in FBI and DOJ, as well as the plain old opportunist skunks. One hopes that a few strategically places levers, like Horowitz, Huber, and likely a few others in other agencies, will shine daylight on some of the corruption. I see Grassley, Nunes, Goodlatte, and a few others are pushing from the Congressional side too - but I give each branch a bit of slack for institutional protection.

[Disestablishmentarian]

Well-intentioned Congressmen are unfortunately just a sideshow.

Someone remind me the last time a Congressional investigation amounted to anything more than a bucket of spit.

I don’t think Sara Carter is to blame for this. She’s just reporting.

[tiki]

I can’t find my better link but here is Trump at Davos. I think he was making a point.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzM2cjuCO2A

[WildHighlander57]

I remember on one of the threads, the discussion about raincoats.

But the timing of them stepping forward at that point in the speech, argues against it being raincoat distribution.

[No_Doll_i]

I’m going to dinner, maybe Q will post and give us all something else to talk about.

Post em if ya see em.

Back in a while.

[WildHighlander57]

Yes! They are excellent !

[Wneighbor]

What do the NATO vehicles look like?

The vehicles I've seen were all white sedans with the NATO light blue emblems on doors with a unique license plate. Had I not been driving I would have snapped photos. With traffic being what it is on that interstate I can't give a better description and if I attempted it would probably be wrong. The first time my husband was with me and did confirm I read NATO correctly FWIW.

[huldah1776]

I was wondering what Trump was saying at the time. I should actually watch the speech again for moto.

[Wneighbor]

Agreed 188% Greeneyes.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Thanks!

Just wondered.

[Cboldt]

Looking at the structure of the August 2, 2017 scope letter, I think all the redacted stuff is a list of names and allegations.

The following allegations were within the scope of the investigation at the time of your appointment are are in the within the scope of the Order:

[redacted - about as much page space as unredacted Manafort]

• Allegations that Paul Manafort:
  • Committed a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials with respect to the Russian government's efforts to interfere with the 2016 election for President of the United States, in violation of United States law;
  • Committed a crime or crimes arising out of payments he received from the Ukrainian government before and during the tenure of President Viktor Yankovych:

[redacted - about three times the page space as unredacted Manafort]

You therefore have authority to continue and complete the investigation of those matters, and additional matters described in 28 CFR 600.4. ...

The letter goes on to say that anything else needs a consultation with Rosenstein.

I estimate there are five named potential defendants or people to be investigated, and that the list includes Sessions, Donald Trump Jr., Flynn, and Carter Page.

Rosenstein and Mueller do not want to disclose this scope, and it has nothing to do with tipping off the people under their microscope. Everybody knows.

[little jeremiah]

Thinking over your comment.

I assume you are surmising the Chinese wall and sandbagging and don’t have concreted evidence?

Q says to trust Wray and Sessions. Sessions several times. I assume that Q isn’t just saying that Sessions is well meaning but foiled and hamstrung by bad guys he can do nothing about. I would assume it also means he (and Wray)is on the job and will take the right actions based on the right info. So if that is true, then Sessions could not be crippled and blinded by a raft of black hat underlings that he is somehow helpless to do anything about.

[StormFlag]

TRUST SESSIONS Q DROPS

Searching the Q posts for all that included TRUST SESSIONS, and then I looked for some news about the AG around those drop dates. I don't claim that this is comprehensive, but for any doubters, I for one, will continue to trust him and hope he will get all the information he needs – knowing that some may be kept from him by bad actors.

December 18 Q drop TRUST SESSIONS
Fox6now.com MILWAUKEE -- Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Monday, December 18th delivered remarks in Milwaukee on efforts to combat violent crime in American cities and neighborhoods. Sessions said he is asking for 40 new prosecutors for violent crime -- with the Milwaukee area getting two.
DOJ Press Release December 21, 2017 Attorney General Jeff Sessions Rescinds 25 Guidance Documents “Last month, I ended the longstanding abuse of issuing rules by simply publishing a letter or posting a web page. Congress has provided for a regulatory process in statute, and we are going to follow it. This is good government and prevents confusing the public with improper and wrong advice.”

January 14 Q drop TRUST SESSIONS
January 4 Law.com U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Thursday rescinded Obama-era policies shielding marijuana-legalized states
January 22 USA Today In a statement Monday, Sessions said the FBI had not retained messages between the two, from Dec.14, 2016 to May 17, 2017, the day Mueller was appointed to lead Justice's inquiry into Russia interference in the 2016 election. “We will leave no stone un-turned to confirm with certainty why these text messages are not now available to be produced and will use every technology available to determine whether the missing messages are recoverable from another source," Sessions said.

FEB 18, 2018 Q post TRUST SESSIONS
February 18, Washington Examiner Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in an interview aired Sunday the process used by the FBI to obtain warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act will be investigated after allegations of abuses of power committed by the agency under the Obama administration.

March 8, 2018. Q post Do you TRUST SESSIONS? BOOM
March 8 http://sd30.senate.ca.gov/news/news/2018-03-08-march-8-2018-hill-trump-sessions-escalate-war-california Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Wednesday announced a new lawsuit against the state of California, escalating a war of words between the conservative administration and the liberal capital of the so-called resistance.
Sessions also announced later in March Daily Beast Apr 3 “ without saying anything publicly at the time, he had appointed the U.S. Attorney for Utah, John Huber, to team up with Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz to conduct an internal investigation into all the questions that Republicans in Congress have raised about the FBI and its allegedly raging anti-Trumpery.”

April 10 Q drop TRUST SESSIONS
April 10 Washington Post In a statement Monday, Sessions said he would not renew the National Commission on Forensic Science, a roughly 30-member advisory panel of scientists, judges, crime lab leaders, prosecutors and defense lawyers chartered by the Obama administration in 2013. A path to meet needs of overburdened crime labs will be set by a yet-to-be-named senior forensic adviser and an internal department crime task force, Sessions’s statement said.

[huldah1776]

Just looked it up online and each had an umbrella in their hand.