Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister
This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
rofl, the NYC city case had an actual bomb that actually went off (to a limited extent), that is NOTHING like a case of undercover agents either supplying inert materials (so no one actually gets hurt) or arresting the perp when the materials are transferred.
You have zero zero zero evidence that there were any “undercover” agents involved or that the NYC attack was “thwarted”.... the guy had an actual bomb, it’s just that he was an amateur and did not know how to make it effective enough (fortunately).
Stop with all the insults. You do not help your case. Try some actual analysis....
to a “limited extent” LOL you mean it didn’t blow up, it just bunred him kind of like it was spakler instead of a firecracker
hahaha thanks for answering the question, you are that stupid and you are that stubborn LOL
thanks again for the opportunity to prove what a stupid hateful troll you are BYE
It is you who are immensely ignorant. As usual, you have no idea what you are talking about. It is sad that you cannot reason and analyze intelligently. So your “theory” is that super duper undercover agents sent an ISIS inspired terrorist into NYC subway tunnels with an actual bomb to set off because they were certain that it would only burn the perp and not actually make any larger explosion? That is nutty.
Enchante doesn't 'trust' the NY times Or WAPO they just repeat them LOL stupid troll...
The conspiracy theory behind a curious Roseanne Barr - WAPO
It's a pretty typical product of the #QAnon genre, promising the final defeat of the president's enemies and engaging in some inventive ideas about how the military works.
That's why Barr's tweet rattled observers of far-right media. We've seen conspiracy theories jump into the mainstream before; we've even seen Barr tweet about them. As Amy Zimmerman reported last summer, when the White House celebrated the news that “Roseanne” was coming back to TV, Barr had “retweeted Infowars reports on the '5.7 Million Illegals' who they baselessly claim voted in the presidential election”
The Conspiracy Theory That Says Trump Is a Genius - NY TIMES
As Paris Martineau explained in New York Magazine, QAnon was born last October, when someone claiming to have “Q” level security clearance started a cryptic thread on 4chan, the online message board and troll playground. It was titled, “The Calm Before the Storm,” a phrase Trump had recently used. Q posted hints, some in the form of questions, ostensibly meant to help clued-in Trump supporters understand what was really going on in Washington beneath the facade of chaos and incompetence. (“What is military intelligence? Why go around the 3 letter agencies?”)
From these clues, a sprawling community on message boards, YouTube videos and Twitter accounts has elaborated an enormous, ever-mutating fantasy narrative about the Trump presidency. In the QAnon reality, Trump only pretended to collude with Russia in order to create a pretext for the hiring of Robert Mueller, the special counsel, who is actually working with Trump to take down an inconceivably evil and powerful network of coup-plotters and child sex traffickers that includes Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and George Soros.
that’s the point of a false flag you effin idiot they LET it happen to get a desired result like a school shooting to advance the ANTI-gun agenda.
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/10/us/boston-police-werent-told-fbi-got-warning-on-tsarnaev.html
The F.B.I. did not tell the Boston police about the 2011 warning from Russia about Tamerlan Tsarnaev, one of the two brothers accused in the Boston Marathon bombings,
The FBI said it failed to act on a tip about the suspected Florida school shooter’s potential for violence
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-fbi-investigation-mateen-20160712-snap-story.html
The FBI investigated the Orlando mass shooter for 10 months — and found nothing.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/06/did-the-fbi-miss-warning-signs-around-mateen.html
Did the FBI Miss the Warning Signs for Orlando Gunman?
Senate probe faults Army, FBI for missing warning signs before Fort Hood attack
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/15/fbi-missing-mass-shooters-florida-nikolas-cruz-omar-mateen/
The FBI Keeps Missing Mass Shooters Before It’s Too Late
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pulse-nightclub-shooting-gunman-father-fbi-informant-seddique-mateen/
Father of Pulse gunman was FBI informant, widow’s attorneys say
You can’t seem to analyze the NYC bomber case that YOU brought up. You just make assertions as though you “know” secrets that no one else does. Where is a shred of evidence that undercover govt agents worked with the bomber but “thwarted” his terror attack? So you believe that govt agents would know what he was planning, help him but sabotage his bomb, and let him go among thousands of innocent people in subway tunnels just assuming that the explosion would not be too bad?
In other cases of undercover counter-terror operations the perp(s) either gets totally inert harmless materials or else is arrested at the point of receiving dangerous materials. But you imagine that nefarious govt agents wanted him to be able to set off a pipe bomb in a busy subway tunnel because they would rather have a messy failed attack (which could have harmed a lot more innocent people) than no attack at all.
And the “why” of all this is never explained — an apparent ISIS inspired attack in NYC does not help the “Deep State” in opposing POTUS Trump. If anything it tends to motivate the public to support stronger counter-terror, counter-jihad measures. It tends to support Trump’s MAGA agenda, not oppose it.
Your “theory” is an unbaked hash of silliness.
Seeing as you are so ignorant of history and how the world works here is a famous false flag that the Germans dressed up as polish soldiers to kill other Germans to have justification for invading Poland.
Ever hear the expression “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” well they were talking about dopes like you...
The Gleiwitz incident was a covert Nazi German attack on the German radio station Sender Gleiwitz on the night of 31 August 1939, widely regarded as a deceitful false flag operation staged along with some two dozen similar German incidents on the eve of the invasion of Poland leading up to World War II in Europe. The attackers had been posed as Polish nationals. Adolf Hitler invaded Poland the very next morning after a lengthy period of preparations. During his declaration of war, Hitler did not mention Gleiwitz incident by name, but grouped all provocations staged by the SS as an alleged Polish assault on Germany. The Gleiwitz incident is the best-known action of Operation Himmler, a series of special operations undertaken by the Schutzstaffel (SS) to serve Nazi German propaganda at the outbreak of war. They were intended to create the appearance of Polish aggression against Germany in order to justify the subsequent invasion of Poland. The evidence for the Gleiwitz attack by the SS was provided by the German SS officer, Alfred Naujocks in 1945.
Operation Himmler (less often known as Operation Konserve or Operation Canned Goods) was a 1939 false flag project planned by Nazi Germany to create the appearance of Polish aggression against Germany, which was subsequently used by the Nazis to justify the invasion of Poland. This included staging false attacks on themselves using innocent people or concentration camp prisoners. Operation Himmler was arguably the first act of the Second World War in Europe.
Your paranoid delusions are noted. Not every form of govt incompetence is a planned “false flag” attack. Often Ockham’s Razor is correct, the more straightforward explanations (incompetence, ignorance, complacency, political correctness) are more plausible than the arcane, convoluted, imaginary explanations.
The list of links and cases you provide does not seem to offer ANY case of “false flag” attacks. You have a list of instances of great govt ineptitude shaped by libtard ignorant policies and complacency, yes. But do you have any instances here of “false flag” attacks?
You have a fertile imagination but far too little ability to analyze, reason, argue with intelligence....
hey do you think anyone will notice that my posts contain links and actual factual information and yours are just full of your bloviating denials???
I am well aware of the Nazi/Poland case, and of the concept of false flag attacks and staged incidents. I know more history than you will ever know. But you never provide any intelligent analysis of the domestic USA cases which YOU claim are “false flag” operations by some undercover entity. You just make the wild assertions, sounding like some paranoid ranting fabulist. Oh wait, I guess that’s what you are.
You are a good example of how the internet has inspired the worst thinkers among us (you) to think you know something you don’t. Peppering posts with links, without analysis or intelligent explanation, is often useless. Worse than useless in your case. It allows you to pretend to “knowledge” when you know nothing. Throwing up undigested links to matters you do not understand does not advance understanding.
When I talk with you I try to start from basics, because you prove incapable of understanding or explaining even simple matters. I try not to complicate the picture too quickly, because you can’t even focus on the simple questions which you never do answer.
If only an ignorant trolls opinion mattered to me, too bad it doesn’t..
va te faire foutre, En-chan-te
Yet again, you demonstrate your pathetic inability to analyze, reason, to THINK.
Your clusters of paranoid opinions are not interesting, when you provide zero evidence or reasoning to support them. You are the definition of a nutcase.
haha
I post links so that individuals can go and read the info and REACH THEIR OWN CONCLUSIONS, you are a fascist control freak that wants to tell everyone what they should think and is horrified that people will have the information to make up their own minds, you can’t stand that someone doesn’t agree with you cause it damages your fragile psyche.
see I’ve told you what I think, you try and tell me what I should think EFF OFF
btw, when you are going to use a source verbatim the honest policy is to show you are QUOTING from a source, not using your own words. Your comment gives the false impression that YOU have described the Gleiwitz incident, when in fact you have appropriated the WIKIPEDIA description verbatim. This is called plagiarism. This is dishonest on your part. You should have set the passage off in quotes and italics, with a link to the WIKIPEDIA passage you are using:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident
Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.
You sound like a silly Leftard with your abuse of the term “fascist”.... I told you that you know nothing of history and you prove it again. Not everyone who disagrees with you on something is a “fascist”....
As for forming one’s own conclusions, that is what I do, unlike you. I am not led around by the nose with internet ramblings that I don’t understand. You never give any evidence of UNDERSTANDING. You just parrot. You are a kind of internet parrot.
Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.
You don’t understand argumentation in the slightest degree. I have given much substantive discussion and analysis, while you provided NONE.
“Paranoid opinions” was a conclusion I formed after observing you post dozens, nay hundreds, of angry rants, abusive attacks, deranged non-responses. Your mind is a gutter of confusion. I have been calling for you to analyze and think, and you refuse, you respond with abuse.
You dare to accuse me of “ad hominem”? That is rich, I have been responding to your continual ad homs with requests for information, reasoning, intelligence. You are incompetent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.