Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister
This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
>>815836
Done in 30.
House cleaning.
WH secured.
Final stage.
Q
This one supposedly means McCain is out. Looks like Q's crystal ball jumped the gun:
Apr 30 2018 09:41:16 (EST) !xowAT4Z3VQ Q ID: 04475a
1247406→
No name out.
Now.
https://mobile.twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/990953165267681281
We love good singers.
Q
Dude. The deal is done. Only a sucker like you can't connect the dots. But tell you what. You go on believing what makes you happy to believe. Wait for the "evidence" to be spoon fed to you by the mainstream media.
And I will remain light years ahead of you. Let me rephrase. Trump and Kim have met. FACE TO FACE. At which time, an overall deal was struck. Denuclearization and rapprochement with South Korea. I wont go so far as to say 188% reunification, but it remains a possibility. But most assuredly denuke and peace treaty.
Peace will have consequences. Positive ones. Reunification may or may not come later. My crystal ball hasn't told me yet. But when it does, I'll try to remember to email your naïve ass with the news.
Do you know about the Middle East? Or are you still stuck on CNN time?
Oh, wait. Let me clear something up for you. Try as you might, you won't be able to find where Q SAID that Trump met face to face with Kim. That's not how this works, as I've previously told you. You know who said it? Bagster did. And Bagster has 188% that he is correct.
Now is where you say, See! See? You're just making that shit up. You have no EVIDENCE!!!!
That's right, big boy. I don't. And you just go on waiting to hear about it on CNN for your evidence. I'll just smile and move along.
[Iran] is next. And in progress. You ponder on North Korea wile the grownups handle that one for you. I'm sure CNN is working on presenting you with all the evidence of what's going on. Haha.
Bagster
You create fictional worlds without evidence. You don’t even seem to understand mundane stuff like “facts” and “evidence” and “knowledge” and “reality.” What you call “connecting the dots” is what far more knowledgeable people call “just making stuff up as you go.”
Yep. A few people read that as Ryan out. Others, like me, interpreted it to mean the White House was secure. Where do you come up with your stuff, Fantifa?
By the way, Ryan IS out. Why? Do you know??? To spend more time with his family, ya think? Hahahahaha.
You don't like the McCain one either? You think NOW means RIGHT now? By God, you're stoopit. I interpret that to mean that it is a certainty NOW that McCain is out. As you may or may not know (I'm thinking you didn't know based on your dumb statements to date) that the McCain camp had been denying rumors that he was "out" for quite a while. NOW we know.
Come on, man.
Oh. And by the way. Ryan out and McCain out are good news. Maybe not to you, but to patriots.
Bagster
Like I said, Enchante. You keep living in a CNN world. I'll try to remember to let you know what's really going on. Or not. It may amuse me to keep you floundering about sputtering about "evidence" and "facts."
In the meantime. You keep waiting for the New York Times to privde your evidence. Or maybe Fox News is more your cup of tea?
I'll just keep "making stuff up" over here.
:)
Bagster
Yes, we all love that Ryan and McVain are on their way out, but Q’s cryptic bs-ing is just a joke. Ryan has been telling colleagues for YEARS that he would not stay in the House too much longer, and McVain is frickin’ DYING of a brain tumor. We need Q to tell us they are on their way out when it was already very widely known that they were/are on their way out? This is silly stuff.
Oh, that's rich.
Keep telling yourself that.
Bagster
Ryan was forced out, despite your naïve bleatings. Why? I havnet a clue.
And you're right. The McCain thing isn't a huge surprise, like the Ryan one was. Just a tidbit tossed out there. Anybody could have seen that one coming. But we now have confirmation. Which is nice.
I've moved on to other things, Ryan having been dealt with and the McCain situation assured. But you go on arguing the point in your effort to maintain your "more knowledgeable people" scenario.
If you want, you can be my mentor. Would you like so subscribe to the Bagster Gazette? It's a daily publication that may provide you with things you may or may not know. I'm predicting not, based on your attitude so far. I have a ping list, I can put you on.
Do I sound cocky? Sure. But it's an attitude come to honestly in the face of such startling naivete and assurance.
Bagster
‘You create fictional worlds without evidence. You dont even seem to understand mundane stuff like facts and evidence and knowledge and reality. What you call connecting the dots is what far more knowledgeable people call just making stuff up as you go.’
This is exactly, detail for detail, what the Obots do. Obotism also has cultish features, btw. Their ground rules are that Obama is a superior being who is honorable inside and out and who never lies. If it *appears* that Obama has lied then this is merely a perception problem. The Obot will weave a fanciful, elaborate tale which always concludes with the same line: ‘So you see, Obama was telling the truth all along.’
In Obot-world, the definition of ‘evidence,’ is: anything an Obot can concoct with his/her unfettered imagination.
The definition of ‘fact,’ is: any product of an Obot’s imagination that works in Obama’s favor.
Not making anything up. I’ve interacted with Obots for years, and this is really how they operate.
Ditto Qers. Facts and evidence are based on two things: Q’s posts and the Qers’ imagination. Fact.
I do not TRUST or rely upon CNN or NYSlimes or WaPo (beyond cursory consideration that I give to all relevant information), thank you. I examine myriad news sources but “Q-drops” are not a news source, they are anonymous mostly cryptic exclamations, assertions, prophecies, etc.
The arrogance of the Q-cult is what creates so much hostility around these topics. This is like trying to talk to people who are on a wild acid trip. Of course your “reality” will differ.
btw, you and edzo4 still fail to give any competent response to my #319. I show that “Q” is incompetent to discuss basic US naval strategy and carrier deployments wrt Asia. You and edzo4 just run away...... If Q is faking it about that, so elementary, then why exactly should we believe he is a knowledgeable insider about any of his stuff? He isn’t. He’s a LARPer, sometimes entertaining, sometimes not so much.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3652490/posts?q=1&;page=319
Thanks for the offer but I don’t do ping lists, nothing personal. I fluctuate too much in my absences here.
Of course it does. Because you at used to being the "smartest person in the room." Can't have that challenged, now can we. I expect that is the psychology of what behind a lot of the "science denying" of you anti-Q cultists. I've been studying this phenomenon for a while now. It's very interesting to me.
I do agree with you about the political ramifications of drastic action on the "swamp draining." And that's really the main purpose of the Q operation, as stated by Q himself. His "leaking" of information is intended to ready us, the people, for the things you say will cause upheaval.
A positive aspect of even your attitude is that, at least you are aware of the possibilities, no matter how you struggle against them right now. When things start to happen, you'll be all like, "huh. I guess that stuff wasn't bullshit" and you'll fall into line with those of us unplugged from the matrix.
In the meantime, just go along as you are. I'd rather have you on the team, because you at a very smart guy. It's just that your mind is locked up and unable to move ahead.
Which is fine, Enchante. I don't hold it against you. I really don't. You'll see that I'm right soon enough.
I'm a patient man.
Bagster
Future proves past.
Watch and see, Carloada. Watch and see.
I'm quite satisfied that things are going well and that "we are winning."
Despite the protestations of you negative nancies. Keep your axe sharp. You may be needed. In the meantime, leave the thinnin' to us, Bobalooey.
No disrespect, just harsh reality. The time for manners is over.
Bagster
That's a leap. I believe in baseball and like the Dodgers. You could say that I believe in baseball. If somebody comes along and says baseball is bullshit, it's rigged, it sucks, I'mm an idiot for liking baseball, I would argue with them.
Does my "belief" in baseball make people who also like baseball a "cult?"
You don't believe in Q. Is that "belief system" a cult? People say atheism is a religion because they don't believe in religion. Do you agree with that?
The same can be applied to any "belief system". What you believe doesn't always require "faith". Sometimes a preponderance of the evidence is enough to establish belief.
Anyway. Please stop saying stupid, unthought out shit to support your belief system. It just makes you sound like a flat earth, science denier, global warming believer. It really does. Keep your argument grounded in reality, if you can. ThanQ.
And keep your axe sharp. You may be needed. Rest your neck until then. We got this.
Bagster
Can we please stay on topic? Conflating completely reasonable possibilities with well-established goofery is no way to make your point. It's desperate buffoonery. You can do better.
You stay amused. And you saying it "isn't anything" doesn't make it so. Words are wind, goodman. Words are wind.
Bagster
What position do you play on the Q team?
Left field or Catcher?
Peanuts....Get your peanuts.....Dodger dogs....Cold beer...Ice cold beer....Dodger bob head dolls....
:)
Next question. I'm here all week.
Bagster
You sell peanuts for the Q team?
Well, you have to start somewhere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.