Awwwwww, is poor Enchante being abused? Want Uncle Bags to fix your owie?
Hahahahaha.
Bagster
Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister
This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Never believe the media.
Gfys you have been given proofs on every q thread you’ve trolled since February. Go Google it you lazy loser I would suggest the NYC false flag bombing that was presented by giving the alleged perp fireworks. But you won’t read it anyways and refuse to accept that it exists so what is the point
oh, they were unbelievably abusive once they knew they’d been “had”.... especially because some prominent Q-culters had fallen for it.
I swear, I really didn’t mean them as an such “trap” — I was just having fun, quickly on the fly, and couldn’t imagine that anyone would take them seriously. But first some of the Q-culters started to try to analyze them very seriously, and then the stuff hit the fan when they knew they’d been shown to be fools. It was an “Emperor has new clothes” moment but that really wasn’t what I was trying for. I was only trying to amuse a bit.....
He hasn’t taken the Qup just yet....
Not casting aspersions on those who follow Q, but counting on gullible fools is a gimme. It doesn't matter what your angle is. Does FoxNews count on gullible fools? CNN?
I think you are as much into "over-analysis" as Q-followers are.
No, I have been given ZERO “proofs” but I also think you must have me mixed up with some other people.
I have been on very few “official” Q threads and I don’t think I was anywhere near them until a few weeks ago. Definitely not in February or March. This is a fairly recent form of entertainment for me. You must be thinking of other people you like to abuse.
I mean that if #4 is really about some serious “Deep State” psyops then they would care to make it as effective as possible. Just grabbing some low-hanging fruit would not be enough to actually benefit the Deep Staters, they would need to create a fairly pervasive or at least more highly visible “movement” under the Q banner.
If it’s not serious “psyops” then it’s just something like the #1 in FantasyWriter’s fine synopsis.
I don’t need him to take the Qup. Just Qorner Kyle into the wall.
Awwwwww, is poor Enchante being abused? Want Uncle Bags to fix your owie?
Hahahahaha.
Bagster
ooh, don’t worry, I would never imagine that anyone will be “taking down” the Q-cult, the rot is too pervasive. I would sooner expect to be able to abolish Scientology, and that ain’t happening soon either.
Phhht. At least I don’t have low T. Get a grip
Bagster
Cocaine is a hell of a drug.
Was that a slap?
You got one vile mouth on yourself!
Looks like the very first time I popped my head in on an official Q-cult thread was April 8. That is nowhere near “February” but then I’ve noticed that Q-culters are extremely sloppy about dates, facts, and basic accuracy.
Replied Re: Q Anon: (4/8/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration
From edzo4 received 04/09/2018 6:49:26 PM PDT
edzo4 kindly private messaged me to say “F-— off, troll” and that was one moment when I began to realize that Q is a cult and Q-followers cannot bear to have their Q-God challenged.
Are you Ok? Do you need a check-up?
I see Salvation is online posting now. Seems unaffected by all this so far. But it’s all over if she opens a Qatholic forum!
Don't I?
And this is nice Bagster. Just imagine.
:)
p.s. I thought it was game on? What's up, nukka?
Bagster
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.