Who is #Qanon? (really interesting 19:30 video)

YouTube ^ | 4/27/2018 | Titus Frost

[Beave Meister]

This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.

[kevao]

Is Q sacred, somehow, and not to be parodied?

Mocking Q is heresy, according to the Q'ran.

[Enchante]

Yes, oh yes. One of the funniest moments after one of my parody “Q-drops” was after the Q-cult complained to the mods and got the comments nuked.

A short time later, one of the Q-regulars arrived on the thread, saw where another Q-regular had said my post was “hilarious” but now there was only a “removed by moderator” visible on the thread..... so the new arrival sent me a very nice FReepmail, saying “what did I miss, please tell me, what did I miss?”

He did not yet know that the “official” Q-cult view was to insult and ostracize me, so he was asking me very nicely for my Q-drop. Alas, it was composed on the fly, I did not keep a copy, and I did not feel like trying to re-create it, so I could not help him.

[Fantasywriter]

I’m inclined to go with 4 also. Interspersed with some of the less impressive items are a few details that seem definitely Deep State-oriented.

Thank you for the kind words. I’m fine. I don’t take the Qers very seriously, plus they are entirely predictable. It’s all good.

[Fantasywriter]

Thanks for the input. I’ll revise the synopsis before I post it again. [I love, btw, the fact that the Qers have no similar synopsis. I saw a wide open opportunity and took full advantage.]

[Enchante]

Show any examples of where “Q” provided real, hard info in advance of an event.

Sure, vague prophecies like “boom” which can be interpreted through just about any subsequent event....

But show where Q has provided any real predictions, secret info made public, etc.

Every time I have looked at Q he is just surfing the web and regurgitating stuff that is out there, or else pretending to make predictions that are not falsifiable.

[Fantasywriter]

Could you elaborate? Do you, for example, think Sessions and Wray are doing a pretty good job?

[eyedigress]

I may jump in if around. Slap Bagster back to El Segundo.

[kevao]

So you still haven’t aQeppted your new handle.

Your Q d’é·tat will be Qrushed!

And the comes the debunQing!!!

[Enchante]

Yes, it’s a very helpful synopsis. Oh, and I am not at all wedded to my 1.5....

I do think it is somewhat likely based upon what I have seen, but I definitely do not care enough about “Q” to make any thorough study of the matter.

[eyedigress]

I am staying with Sessions. He has a mandate, cripple MS-13.

[kevao]

but I definitely do not care enough about “Q” to make any thorough study of the matter.

Lack of Quriosity?

[eyedigress]

I think I have it.

“Truex takes Dover” ..... Its code

[Fantasywriter]

Lol. I see you’re having some fun.

+1

[kevao]

You got it. It’s all about NASQAR!

[Fantasywriter]

I wish the Qers weren’t so thin skinned. I love those parodies.

[kevao]

Well, it’s one way to start the weeQend.

[Fantasywriter]

Now I understand. Thanks for the clarification.

[eyedigress]

TRUEQS FOR THE WIN!

[Fantasywriter]

Bol!

[Enchante]

What seems to me to weigh against 4 is that Q seems so damned amateurish. Of course, a psyops campaign might be designed intentionally so as to appear so amateurish (misdirection so that no one would think of professional Deep Staters), but could “they” really count on gullible fools to swallow it?? And if they wanted it to be a highly successful psyops campaign to help the Deep Staters, wouldn’t they want it to be as convincing as possible?

Just some musings.... It still strikes me that “Q” is an individual motivated to try to launch an idiosyncratic “movement” in support of POTUS Trump and against the “Deep State” .... but Q is quirky, somewhat unhinged (just who from Washington, DC is getting shipped to Gitmo this week?), not too knowledgeable beyond what he happens to read this week on the web, etc.