The Lion Does Not Concern Himself With The Opinions Of The Sheep.
Bagster
Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister
This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
The Lion Does Not Concern Himself With The Opinions Of The Sheep.
Bagster
We? Now you speak for the collective?
Comeback rating:
-6
Please try harder.
Bagster
The Holy Spirit is in charge.
Lots of movement this week.
Well her on FR you don't make that call... not yours no matter how ‘unstoppable’ you think you are. Be a gracious guest for the room our host has kindly offered you for the entertainment it provides.....
Yet I persist.
Bagster
Whatever are you cawwing about?
Is that some form of sideways leg-humpery of JR. Is that really necessary?
Lol—no, a good debunking has yet to happen to me. But my condolences; Qer debunks tend to be long on insults and short on facts.
Some of the Qers just want to get a reaction. It’s their life, apparently.
Just fyi.
Exactly. There are all sorts of “tells” for anyone who knows much of anything about some of Q’s varied topics. Of course, the Q-cult thrives on the mystery and the fact that in many cases it is difficult to “prove the negative.”
Can I “prove” that “Q” is not some high-level military intelligence officer, DoD official, or White House national security official close to POTUS Trump, etc.?? Of course I can’t “prove” that but I’ll say it is “virtually inconceivable” and the people who can’t see that really don’t know very much. There are too many “tells” about Q’s amateur status as some kind of internet enthusiast, scouring the web for interesting nuggets to throw into not very well digested Q-drops. There are too many things that “Q” doesn’t know or understand, that he would if he were really any high-level muckety-muck.
fwiw, I don’t tend to think that Q is some kind of nefarious psyops working against Team Trump interests (although that is of course a possibility). All that I have seen of the Q corpus suggests to me some amateur internet enthusiast, well versed in some things but unaware of his limitations. I think he is probably sincerely pro-Trump and not anti- but the whole “Q level security clearance, high level military intel or White House official” kind of nonsense is just garbage. I think Q is much older than a teenager, bc a teen would be very unlikely to have amassed all the particulars and contexts that Q has displayed (although of course it is possible via sufficient web surfing). So my bet is that Q is some obsessive adult LARPer who wanted to gin up enthusiasm for his version of the Trump agenda.
Is that so bad? Well I think trying to structure any “movement” around false pretences and false beliefs is a bad thing, even if it is intended ultimately to be helpful.
POTUS Trump doesn’t need fake LARPers putting out false schemas, no matter how much “real” info may be included along the way.
Ahahahaha. You got my number, carloada. I sometimes also storm off to watch Survivor.
Meaty stuff, that.
Bagster
p.s. It's good you're paying attention. You may gain some knowledge by osmosis.
Great post.
Yes, maybe I’ll change my freep handle to bagster_lite.
Sister-friend, you live in a constant state of debunk. And I note you slipped in another poor pitiful me whine. Will you include a snivel in every post from here on out?
Bagster
...”The Lion Does Not Concern Himself With The Opinions Of The Sheep”.....
HAHAHA! You could have at least been original that’s straight out of “Game of Thrones”.....but then we do know you’re a player.
Heck it even sounds like a defection actually....since you responded ......it’s rather like when Baghdad Bob carried on that Saddam’s army is “defeating” the Imperialist invaders in the Iraq War, that American soldiers are committing suicide in face of glorious fighting sons of Iraq, and other what the heck was he talking about announcements issued daily by him during the war.
You can do better! ...well ....perhaps not too!
I explained in #319 why no one should mistake “Q” for someone highly knowledgeable in military and strategic matters.
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3652490/posts?page=319#319
Unless you can explain how/why I am wrong, it is you who are among the sheep. Actually, I think of Bagspit as more of a weasel.
Oh you want to play do you Bagster! Game on!....
Don’t sell yourself short. Twenty-four hours later, and I still haven’t recovered completely from your debunking — the most debilitating debunking I’ve yet experienced. Seriously.
You are in no position to know what Trump "needs" or wants, and yet you say you do. You flatly state that Q is not connected to Trump as if it's fact then go from there.
You admit that "some" of the information is factual because it cannot be denied. Yet you cling to your non-belief.
I interpret this as meaning you are slowly coming around to the truth. Babysteps, if you will. I expect this time next year you will be fully on team Q. Some people are always late to the party.
Bagster
Well obvious I don’t come here often as it’s entertainment for the most part. Some far more than others do love the attention they get here though. Perhaps it feeds their inner child that appears to suffer from reaching out to the keyboard and striking all the juvenile cords we read.
Stay debunked if you know what's good for ya'.
Bagster
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.